Allowed
V.Pandi v. Velmurugan
Madras HCA/2080/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The single judge allowed an application for impleading the 11th respondent as a party defendant in a suit involving property.
What did the court decide?
Application allowed; Plaintiff directed to amend cause title by 05.08.2022.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.No.2080 of 2022 in C.S.No.373 of 2021
¶2
Krishnan Ramasamy, J.,
¶3
This application has been filed for impleading 11th respondent as a party defendant in the suit.
¶4
- Even though the name of 11th respondent is printed in the cause list, none appeared on behalf of him.
¶5
- This Court is of the view that since 11th respondent is a purchaser of the property, during the pendency of the suit, it is necessary to implead 11th respondent as a party defendant in the suit. Hence, this Application is allowed.
¶6
- Post the matter on 11.08.2022. Plaintiff is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title and other places, on or before 05.08.2022.
¶7
25.07.2022
¶8
Sni
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the 11th respondent, as a purchaser of the property, should be impleaded as a party defendant in the suit.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Plaintiff
- respondent
11th Respondent
Coram
AI extract
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court