The single judge considered an application to condone a delay of 66 days in filing a written statement. The respondent had no objection. The court was satisfied with the cause shown and allowed the application.
Delay of 66 days in filing the written statement was condoned and application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1740 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Div). No.105 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
This applicant is filed to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the
written statement in response to the counter claim.
allowed.
being satisfied that sufficient cause is made out, this application is allowed
and the delay is condoned.
List on 08.06.2022.
20.04.2022
kal
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.1 of 2_
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
kal
A.No.1740 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Div). No.105 of 2021
20.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.2 of 2_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can condone a delay of 66 days in filing the written statement to the counter claim.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
