Victoria Institute of Technology v. Vellore Institute of Technology and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
1697 & 1698 of 2022 in C.S. No.657 of 2008 A…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A. Nos. 1697 & 1698 of 2022 in C.S. No.657 of 2008
A. Nos. 1697 & 1698 of 2022 in C.S. No.657 of 2008
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
These two applications are presented to reopen the evidence of D.W.1 and to recall D.W.1.
- The learned counsel for the applicant points out that the documents relied upon by the 1st defendant were inadvertently not marked in the course of examination in chief. The present applications are filed for such purpose.
- The respondent/plaintiff has no objection to these applications being allowed.
- Upon considering the reasons stated by the 1st defendant, these
applications are allowed as prayed for.
1/2
A. Nos. 1697 & 1698 of 2022 in C.S. No.657 of 2008
Coram
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court