The High Court of Madras granted an application for the production of an assignment deed subject to objections regarding admissibility, relevance, and proof.
The application to produce an assignment deed is allowed subject to objections on admissibility, relevance and proof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1913 of 2022
A.No.1913 of 2022 in C.S.No.593 of 2019
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
This application is filed by the fifth defendant in the suit seeking to
produce an assignment deed dated 20.03.2009. It is stated that this document is not a new document but merely the final complete version of the first document produced by the defendant. The plaintiff opposes this application on the ground that the applicant is seeking to substitute the document that was previously produced.
is permitted to exhibit this document subject to the objections of the respondent
/ plaintiff inter alia on grounds of admissibility, relevance and proof. The respondent / plaintiff is also permitted to file an affidavit of admission / denial in respect of this document. A.No.1913 of 2022 is allowed on these terms.
rna
16.06.2022
1/2
A.No.1913 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
A.No.1913 of 2022 in C.S.No.593 of 2019
16.06.2022
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff's objection to producing an assignment deed as a version of a previously produced document withstands legal scrutiny.
Fifth Defendant
Plaintiff
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
