Disposed

M/S.Prabhu Shipping Systems v. Under Secretary to the Government of India

Madras HC22 Feb 2021WP(MD)/995/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought transfer of pending customs appeal to another bench. Court directed the appellate tribunal to list the appeal for video conference before the Division Bench. The lower order was stayed pending disposal of the stay application. Petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Respondent-2 to list the petitioner's appeal along with the stay application before the Hon'ble Division Bench in its next sitting.

M/S.Prabhu Shipping Systems Vs Under Secretary to… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.995 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.02.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.995 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)No.865 of 2021

¶4

M/s.Prabhu Shipping Systems, a Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Partner A.Prabhu, Customs Broker No.AARFP7552PCH001, No.2/5A, First Street, Sivanthakulam, Tuticorin-628 003. ... Petitioner Vs 1.Under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Room No.51-II, North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2.The Registrar, Customs, Excise and Service Tax, Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench, Sastri Bhavan Annexe Building, No.26, First Floor, Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006.

¶5

3.The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, New Horbour Estate, Tuticorin-628 004.

¶6

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the transfer of the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner in Diary No.406482020, dated 29.10.2020 preferred as against the order dated 25.09.2020 in Original Number TUT-CUSTM-PRV-COM-004/2020-21 on the file of the third respondent now pending before the second respondent to any other Regional Bench preferably at Bangalore or any other place .

¶7

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya For R1 : Mr.S.Jeyasingh Standing Counsel For R2 & R3 : Ms.S.Ragavendhre Central Government Standing counsel

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

1/5

¶10

W.P.(MD)No.995 of 2021

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶13

2.The petitioner had suffered the petition mentioned adverse order dated 25.09.2020 at the hands of the third respondent. Questioning the same, the petitioner has filed an appeal before the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that the appeal is not being taken up. That necessitated filing of the present writ petition.

¶14

3.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel produced a copy of the communication dated 16.02.2021 from the Assistant Registrar (CESTAT), Chennai. It is mentioned therein that the Bench sitting was held on 12.02.2021 and 19.02.2021. It is further stated that the matters are being heard by video conferencing pursuant to the request made by the party concerned.

¶15

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready to get along with the case through video conferencing. In fact, the petitioner's counsel would state that a letter to this effect was already sent on 18.02.2021. But then, the case could not be listed on 19.02.2021.

¶16

5.Therefore, the second respondent is directed to list the petitioner's appeal along with the stay application before the Hon'ble Division Bench in its next sitting. I hope that such a sitting will take place before the end of this month. Since the petitioner could not pray for an interim stay of the order, that is the subject matter of the appeal, for reasons beyond their control, the petition mentioned order dated 25.09.2020 passed by the third respondent will stand stayed till the Hon'ble Division Bench (CESTAT), Chennai, takes up and disposes of the petitioner's stay application. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar (CS I)

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶21

rmi

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

2/5

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.995 of 2021

¶25

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶26

TO 1.Under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Room No.51-II, North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2.The Registrar, Customs, Excise and Service Tax, Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench, Sastri Bhavan Annexe Building, No.26, First Floor, Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006.

¶27

3.The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, New Horbour Estate, Tuticorin-628 004. +1 CC to M/s.S.JEYASINGH, Advocate ( SR-6499[F] dated 22/02/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.P.JESSI JEEVA PRIYA, Advocate ( SR6828[F] dated 24/02/2021 )

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.995 of 2021 22.02.2021 SV2(CO) KK(02.03.2021) 3P 6C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

3/5

M/S.Prabhu Shipping Systems v. Under Secretary to the Government of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Prabhu Shipping Systems v. Under Secretary to the Government of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Dhanadhanya Dwellings(Pvt) Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax

Sri Balaganesan Spinners Vs the Joint Commissioner of Customs

Vanniarajan.C Vs the Regional Transport Authority

Solai.C Vs State Rep.by

Kumaraguru Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police

Rajesh.P Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer