Solai.C v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed in limine. The Court directed the petitioner to file the matter before the jurisdictional court for release of the vehicle, noting that the vehicle was already produced there.
What did the court decide?
Direction to petitioner to move the jurisdictional court; Writ Petition disposed of.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD)No.3261 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.02.2021 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.3261 of 2021
C.Solai ... Petitioner
Vs
1.State rep. by Inspector of Police, Arimalam Police Station, (Cr.No.298 of 2020) Pudukkottai District.
2.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Court Campus, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to return/release the vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 55 Y 3973 TATA ACE to the petitioner for interim custody.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Y.George Williams For Respondents : Mr.B.Bhagawathi Government Advocate
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition could be disposed of by directing the petitioner to move the jurisdictional court for release of the vehicle.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Solai
- respondent
State represented by Inspector of Police, Arimalam Police Station
- respondent
Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Pudukkottai
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer, Court Campus, Pudukkottai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court