Disposed

Maheswari.R v. the District Collector

Madras HC22 Apr 2021WP(MD)/8292/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench disposed of a writ petition petitioned by R.Maheswari seeking removal of encroachment on government land. The court dispensed with notice to the fourth respondent (encroacher). It directed the third respondent to act upon further representation by surveying the site with the fourth respondent and initiating action if encroachment is found, without issuing positive directions imme

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition stood disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to remove encroachment only upon receipt of further representation and a joint inspection with the fourth respondent, findi

Maheswari.R Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.[MD]No.8292 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.04.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶5

W.P.[MD]No.8292 of 2021

R.Maheswari

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector,

¶10

Madurai District,

¶11

Madurai.

¶12

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti,

¶13

Madurai District.

¶14

3.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

¶15

4.Mariappan

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

P RAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment put up by the fourth respondent in Government Odai comprised in Survey No.196/6 situated at T.Kallupatti Revenue Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District based on the petitioner's representation dated 27.08.2019.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sadeskumar

¶19

For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.K.MU.Muthu

¶20

Additional Government Pleader

¶21

**O R D E R **************

¶22

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶23

With the consent on either side, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶24

2.Heard Mr.S.Sadeskumar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mu.Muthu, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for respondents 1 to 3.

¶25

3.In the light of the orders we propose to pass, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The petitioner, by way of this writ petition has sought for

¶27

1/3

¶28

W.P.[MD]No.8292 of 2021

¶29

appropriate direction upon the third respondent to remove the encroachment in an Odai.

¶30

5.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the third respondent, on instructions, submitted that appropriate directions may be issued to the third respondent to proceed in accordance with law.

¶31

6.Since, we are disposing of this writ petition without notice to the fourth respondent, we are not issuing any positive direction. However, if any representation is given by the petitioner, the same shall be taken note of and the third respondent shall give notice to the fourth respondent, conduct inspection / survey in the presence of the fourth respondent and if any encroachment is found, then, after passing a speaking order, action shall be initiated to remove the encroachment. This direction shall be complied with as expeditiously as possible.

¶32

7.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

Assistant Registrar (CSI)

¶34

// True Copy //

¶35

/ /2021

¶36

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶37

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. MR To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶38

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶39

3.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

2/3

¶42

W.P.[MD]No.8292 of 2021

¶43

+1 CC to M/s.S.SADESKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-17234[F] dated 23/04/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-17345[F] dated 23/04/2021 )

¶44

ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD]No.8292 of 2021

¶45

22.04.2021

¶46

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶47

3/3

Maheswari.R v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maheswari.R v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Manikannan Vs the District Collector

M/S.Sswana Motors Vs M/S.City Union Bank Ltd.

Dharmar Vs The District Collector

Shanmughanandha Karthees Vs the Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Pondicherry

Vignesh Vs The Superintendent of Police

The Government of Tamilnadu Vs a.Gnanaselvi