Disposed

Dharmar v. The District Collector

Madras HC21 Apr 2021WP(MD)/4782/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Public Interest Litigation seeking removal of encroachments in a street near a temple, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court observed that notice had been issued for survey. The court directed official respondents to conduct the survey and afford an opportunity of personal hearing before taking action, then disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directing land acquisition officials to conduct the scheduled survey and seek personal hearing from the alleged encroachers before taking action.

Dharmar Vs The District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.4782 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.04.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶3

W.P.(MD)No.4782 of 2020

¶4

Dharmar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Dindigul, Dindigul (District). 2.The Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Dindigul, Velunachiyar (Campus), Dindigul (District). 3.The Tahsildar, Nilakkottai Taluk, Nilakkottai, Dindigul (District). 4.The Executive Officer, Nilakkottai Town Panchayat, Nilakkottai, Dindigul (District). 5.Varthagar Sangam, Represented by its Secretary, S.S.Rajendran, 3-3-1, Madurai Veeran Kovil Street, Nilakkottai, Dindigul (District). 6.Mr.Krishnasamy 7.Mr.Manickam ... Respondents

¶5

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to remove the encroachments made by the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 in the street bearing survey No.688/6 and to restore the street in and around the said Arulmigu Maduraiveeran in Nilakkottai (Town), Dindigul (District) based on the Petitioner's representation dated 21.09.2019.

¶6

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Selva For Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr.K.P.Krishnadass Special Government Pleader For Respondent Nos.5 to 7 : Mr.R.R.Kannan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

1/3

¶8

W.P.(MD)No.4782 of 2020

¶9

ORDER

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)

¶11

The writ petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, has been filed, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to remove the encroachments made by the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 in the street bearing survey No.688/6 and to restore the street in and around the said Arulmigu Maduraiveeran in Nilakkottai (Town), Dindigul (District), based on the Petitioner's representation dated 21.09.2019.

¶12

2.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 on instructions submitted that already notice has been issued to respondent Nos.5 to 7 on 16.04.2021, fixing the date of survey on 28.04.2021.

¶13

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that encroachments are in and around Arulmigu Maduraiveeran Temple and the road margins etc., This allegation is denied by the learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7 stating that they are having documents, which are ancient documents, and it would establish the truth and opportunity may be given to the fifth respondent to produce all those documents to establish that there is no encroachment in the public land.

¶14

4.In view of the above, the official respondents are directed to conduct the survey, which is scheduled to be conducted on 28.04.2021, and thereafter, take action in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to respondent Nos.5 to 7.

¶15

5.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶18

¶19

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

2/3

¶22

W.P.(MD)No.4782 of 2020

¶23

To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Dindigul, Dindigul (District). 2.The Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Dindigul, Velunachiyar (Campus), Dindigul (District). 3.The Tahsildar, Nilakkottai Taluk, Nilakkottai, Dindigul (District). 4.The Executive Officer, Nilakkottai Town Panchayat, Nilakkottai, Dindigul (District).

¶24

+2 CC to M/s.RR KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-17026[F]dated 22/04/2021 )

¶25

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-17143[F] dated 22/04/2021 )

¶26

W.P.(MD)No.4782 of 2020

¶27

21.04.2021

¶28

RK(11.05.2021) 3P 8C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

3/3

Dharmar v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmar v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Branch Manager, Vs the Minimum Wages Act Authority

Vandiyoor Sri Nachiyarammal Vagaira Religious Endowment Vs the Special Commissioner and Commissioner

M/S.Zubana Leathers Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Chief Manager

S.Manikannan Vs the District Collector

M/S.Sswana Motors Vs M/S.City Union Bank Ltd.

Baskaran.J Vs the Dist.Collector