Dismissed

Murugesan.P v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC9 Apr 2021WP(MD)/7741/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ for release of a seized goods carriage alleged to carry illegally quarried gravel. Court dismissed the petition as identical issue was already disposed of, granting liberty to approach the designated Court.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned designated Court for appropriate relief.

Murugesan.P Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.7741 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.04.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

and

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶8

W.P(MD)No.7741 of 2021

P.Murugesan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶13

Padmanabapuram,

¶14

Thuckalai,

¶15

Kanyakumari District.

¶16

2.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Nagercoil,

¶17

Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to forthwith release the Mahindra LMV-Goods Carriage, bearing Registration No.KKL-57-B-6177 to the petitioner, which is in the custody of the first respondent.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar

¶20

ORDER

¶21

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶22

We have heard Mr.S.Sivakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.P.Krishna Dass, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶23

2.The relief sought for in the Writ Petition is to release the vehicle, which has been seized by the respondents on the ground that it was carrying illegally quarried gravel.

¶24

3.The identical issue was considered by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P(MD)No.3998 of 2021 and by order, dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

1/2

¶26

W.P(MD)No.7741 of 2021

¶27

23.03.2021, the said Writ Petition was disposed of by directing the petitioner therein to approach the jurisdictional designated Court. Therefore, we cannot entertain this Writ Petition and the same is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned designated Court for appropriate relief. No costs.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(AD-II)

¶30

// True Copy //

¶31

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶32

¶33

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶34

¶35

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabapuram, Thuckalai, Kanyakumari District.

¶36

2.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶37

+1 CC to M/s.S.SIVAKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-15683[F] dated 09/04/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-15825[F] dated 15/04/2021 )

¶38

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.7741 of 2021 09.04.2021

¶39

KG(CO) TR(15.04.2021) 2P 5C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

2/2

Murugesan.P v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugesan.P v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Muppandal Vs The Inspector of Labour

M.Mangaleshwari, Vs the Secretary to Government

The Secretary to Government, Vs v. Shenbagaraja

S.Dhanalakshmi, Vs the District Collector / Inspector of Panchayat

Alagappan Vs the District Collector

Bharathidasan, Vs Karur Sri Ramakrishna Educational and Charitable Trust