Petitioner sought writ directing allotment of fish market stalls. Court noted petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal of writ petition during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.6141 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.02.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P(MD)No.6141 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD)No.5331 of 2020
Maduraiveeran
.. Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation Building, Trichy. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation Building, Trichy. 4.The City Engineer, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Trichy. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to allot and accommodate the petitioner the wholesale fish vendors of the Puthur Fish Market in the new Fish Market at Kozhuman Road, Woraiyur by permitting him to participate in the bid to be conducted on 08.05.2020 at the 3rd respondent office by considering and passing appropriate orders on the representation dated 10.03.2020 of the petitioner given in person within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.R.Rajrajan, No.1 Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Saji Bino, Nos. 2 to 4 Standing Counsel
1/2
W.P(MD)No.6141 of 2020
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 11.02.2021, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and hence, the matter is posted today under the caption "for withdrawal".
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
3.In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS III)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
dsk To 1.The District Collector, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation Building, Trichy.
3.The Assistant Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation Building, Trichy.
4.The City Engineer, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Trichy.
+1 CC to M/s.S.SAJI BINO, Advocate ( SR-6413[F] dated 22/02/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.K.HEMAKARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-6547[F] dated 22/02/2021 )
+1 CC to M/s.N.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-7000[F] dated 24/02/2021 W.P(MD)No.6141 of 2020 22.02.2021
SV2(CO)
KK(09.03.2021) 2P 8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maduraiveeran
District Collector, Trichy
Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation
Assistant Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation
City Engineer, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
