Dismissed

Palaniyandi.v v. the Dist.Collector

Madras HC22 Feb 2021WP(MD)/3383/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition challenging temple functions and sports activities due to a dispute pending in the Civil Court. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner at liberty to work out remedy before the Civil Court.

Palaniyandi.v Vs the Dist.Collector — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.3383 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.02.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P(MD)No.3383 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)No.2746 of 2021

¶3

V.Palaniyandi .. Petitioner

¶4

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office Premises, Trichy.

¶5

2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Trichy.

¶6

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai, Trichy District.

¶7

4.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Vaiyampatti, Trichy District.

¶8

5.The Sub Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Puthanatham, Manapparai, Trichy District.

¶9

6.Varatharasu Gowndar .. Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st to 5^th respondents to consider the representation dated 16.02.2021 and consequently to stop all kinds of temple function and sports related activities at the petitioner's village, namely Perumampatti Village, Manapparai Taluk Trichy District by initiating legal action upon the 6^th respondent.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Jeyakumar Additional Government Pleader

¶12

ORDER

¶13

When this Court intends to dismiss this writ petition, on the ground that the dispute between parties is pending before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

1/2

¶15

W.P(MD)No.3383 of 2021

¶16

Civil Court, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

¶17

2.In view of the above, permission is granted. The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy before the civil Court in the pending suit. No cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar (CRL SIDE)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

dsk

¶23

¶24

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office Premises, Trichy. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Trichy.

¶25

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai, Trichy.

¶26

4.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Vaiyampatti, Trichy.

¶27

5.The Sub Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Puthanatham, Manapparai, Trichy.

¶28

+1 CC to Mr.C.M.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-6782[F] dated 23/02/2021 ) +1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-6694[F] dated 23/02/2021 )

¶29

W.P(MD)No.3383 of 2021 22.02.2021

¶30

VB (02.03.2021) 2P 8C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Palaniyandi.v v. the Dist.Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palaniyandi.v v. the Dist.Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaykumar.P Vs the Tahsildar

Paripooranam Vs the Tahsildar

Swaminathan.O.S.T.S Vs the Director Collector

Ganapathy.P Vs the Branch Manager

Dr.Nagarajan.M Vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar University

Maduraiveeran Vs The District Collector