Writ petition filed to restrain dispossession pending SARFAESI appeal. Court held the matter infructuous and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.464 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P(MD)No.464 of 2009
| A.P.Venkatachalam ... Petitioner Vs. |
|---|
| 1.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. |
| 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District, Salem. |
| 3.The Village Administration Officer, Muthampatty, Salem. |
| 4.The Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, 6/671, Car Street, Salem. ... Respondents |
| PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from dispossession of the petitioner's |
| secured asset when the SARFAESI appeal is pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai S.A.No.237 of 2008. |
| For Petitioner : Mr.Mohan Kumar for Mr.M.Arunmurugan |
| For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader |
| For 4thRespondent : Mr.R.Pandivel Standing Counsel |
1/2
W.P(MD)No.464 of 2009
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in this Writ Petition has now become infructuous. Hence, no further orders are required. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (AE)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
rm
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.
To 1.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District, Salem. 3.The Village Administration Officer, Muthampatty, Salem. +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-34567[F] dated 16/11/2021 ) W.P(MD)No.464 of 2009 15.11.2021
RK/PM(25/11/2021) 2P 5C
2/2
A.P.Venkatachalam
The District Collector, Salem District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District
The Village Administration Officer, Muthampatty
The Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
