Disposed

Ragavan.Ml v. the District Collector

Madras HC12 Nov 2021WP(MD)/18241/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice C.V.Karthikeyan disposed of two writ petitions under Article 226 challenging the refusal to grant patta due to possession by a receiver. The Court directed the Tahsildar to pass orders within a specific timeframe to enable initiators of further legal proceedings by the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tahsildar to pass orders on possession status by 03.12.2021; disposal of the two Writ Petitions.

Ragavan.Ml Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.18241 and 18267 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.11.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD)Nos.18241 and 18267 of 2021

¶4

W.P.(MD).No.18241 of 2021

¶5

ML.Ragavan ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the fourth respondent to carry out necessary changes in the Register of Patta Pass-Books pertaining the new Survey No.155/10 of Chekkalaikkottai revenue Village based on the registered sale deed, dated 12.11.1987 registered in document No.1282 with Joint Sub Registrar-II, Karaikudi within the time as fixed by this Court.

¶9

W.P.(MD).No.18267 of 2021

¶10

SP.Jegadeesan ... Petitioner

¶11

Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/3

¶14

W.P(MD)Nos.18241 and 18267 of 2021

¶15

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

¶16

4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the fourth respondent to carry out necessary changes in the Register of Patta Pass-Books based on the new Survey No.674/2 of Block No.7 of Kottaiyur Group in Karaikudi Taluk and the registered of sale deed, dated 17.05.1962 registered in document No.803/1962 with Joint Sub Registrar-II, Karaikudi within the time as fixed by this Court.

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.K.K.Samy For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader (In both Writ Petitions)

¶19

COMMON ORDER

¶20

Learned Additional Government Pleader had forwarded a communication from the Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District addressed to him which is dated 20.10.2021 in Na.Ka.No.A2/45/2021, a copy of which has been given to the Court, in which the Tahsildar had very specifically stated that the grant of patta or transfer of patta cannot be granted in view of the fact that the lands involved, is in the possession of the receiver of Kottaiyur Naattar.

¶21

Let an order in this regard be passed by the Tahsildar and communicated to the writ petitioners so that necessary proceedings can be initiated by the petitioners in furtherance to such order. The Tahsildar/fourth respondent is directed to pass necessary orders on or before 03.12.2021 and communicate the same to the petitioners herein. In view of that particular fact, these Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶22

With the above observations, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

Nsr/Lm

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2/3

¶29

W.P(MD)Nos.18241 and 18267 of 2021

¶30

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶33

2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶34

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶35

W.P(MD)Nos.18241 and 18267 of 2021 12.11.2021

¶36

RK/SKN(24/11/2021) 3P 5C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

3/3

Ragavan.Ml v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ragavan.Ml v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Venkatachalam Vs the Tahsildar

Akilaa V.M Vs the Dental Council of India

Nitheshraj S Vs the District Collector

Kannan.P Vs the District Collector

Sunil Vetha Raj Vs the Regional Passport Officer

Narayanan v Vs the District Collector