Disposed

Sarathkumar.S v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC22 Feb 2021WP(MD)/3278/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to grant permission for a Kabadi tournament. The court, by consent, disposed of the petition without merits, directing the second respondent to consider the pending representation on merits within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within two weeks.

Sarathkumar.S Vs the Superintendent of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

WP(MD)No.3278 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.02.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA W.P.(MD)No.3278 of 2021

¶4

S.Sarathkumar ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

1.The Superintendent of police, Trichy District, Trichy.

¶7

2.The Inspector of Police, Kollidam Police Station, Kollidam,

¶8

Trichy District.

¶9

... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give permission and protection to conduct "Kabadi Tournament" scheduled to be held on 27.02.2021 at Mariyamman Kovil Thidal, Thirupalthurai, Thiruvalarsolai Post, Sri Rengam Taluk, Trichy District on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2021.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr. S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶14

Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for the respondents.

¶15

Mr.K.Arunraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is one of the members of Nehruji Kabadi Club and that Kabadi Tournament is scheduled to be conducted on 27.02.2021 at Mariyamman Kovil Thidal, Thirupalthurai, Thiruvalarsolai Post, Sri Rengam Taluk, Trichy District. His further contention is that he submitted a representation dated 05.02.2021 to the second respondent seeking permission to conduct the said Tournament and till date, no action has been taken by the respondents.

¶16

In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ claim made by the petitioner, this Court directs the second

¶17

1/2

¶18

WP(MD)No.3278 of 2021

¶19

respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law based on findings and on merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of the order.

¶20

With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar (AE)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

rm Note In view of the present lock down owing : to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶25

To 1.The Superintendent of police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kollidam Police Station, Kollidam, Trichy District.

¶26

WP(MD)No.327	8 of 2021
2	2.02.2021

¶27

KK(23.02.2021) 2P 3C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2/2

Sarathkumar.S v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarathkumar.S v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nehru Vs The Superintendent of Police

Esakkimuthu Vs The Deputy Superintendent of POlice

Pandeeswari. v Vs The Commissioner of Police

Kulanthaisamy Vs The Superintendent of Police

Karuppasamy Vs The Superintendent of Police

Prabhakar Vs The Inspector of Police