Dismissed

Karuppasamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC22 Feb 2021CRL OP(MD)/2737/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition, the petitioner sought a direction for police protection for himself and his family. The respondent police accepted that the dispute was to be resolved by the Civil forum. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

petitional representation claiming non-enforcement of dispute resolution agreement was treated as closed, thus protection not granted

Karuppasamy Vs The Superintendent of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.OP(MD).No.2737 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.02.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

¶6

Crl.OP(MD)No.2737 of 2021

¶7

Karuppasamy ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Theni District.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadamali Kundu Police Station, Theni District.

¶11

3.V.Sundaram 4.C.Ganesan 5.G.Buvaneshwari ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family by considering petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2021.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Eswaran For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Erottuchamy

¶14

Government Advocate (Criminal side)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members.

¶17

2.Mr.R.Erottuchamy, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that the representation, dated 06.01.2021 given by the petitioner was registered in CSR No.292 of 2020 and after enquiry, it was closed, since the petitioner and the private respondents 3 to 5 represented before the second respondent police https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

Crl.OP(MD).No.2737 of 2021

¶20

that they would resolve their dispute before the competent Civil forum.

¶21

3.Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

¶22

Assistant Registrar (Records)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

sji

¶26

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Theni District.

¶29

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadamali Kundu Police Station, Theni District.

¶30

Copy to: The Additional The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶31

Crl.OP(MD)No.2737 of 2021 22.02.2021

¶32

srk(CO) KK(11.03.2021) 2P 4C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

2/2

Karuppasamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karuppasamy v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nehru Vs The Superintendent of Police

Esakkimuthu Vs The Deputy Superintendent of POlice

Pandeeswari. v Vs The Commissioner of Police

Kulanthaisamy Vs The Superintendent of Police

Sarathkumar.S Vs the Superintendent of Police

Prabhakar Vs The Inspector of Police