In this writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to stop eviction from Survey No.85/1. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous on the record that the encroachments had already been removed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.[MD]No.2187 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.04.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
W.P.[MD]No.2187 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD) No.1843 of 2020
E.Petchiammal ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
4.The Block Development Officer, Usilampatti,
Madurai District.
5.The Revenue Inspector, Uthappa nayakkanur, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
6.The Deputy Tahsildar,
Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
7.Dr.K.Eswaran ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 6 or their men or agents or their subordinates from evicting the petitioner from the property comprised in Survey No.85/1 situated at Keeripatti Village, Mekkilarpatti Post, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
1/3
W.P.[MD]No.2187 of 2020
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja
For Respondents 1 to 6: Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss,
Special Government Pleader For 7th Respondent : Mr.S.Sarvagam Prabhu
ORDER
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the encroachments having been removed, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
// True Copy //
RM
Note In view of the present lock down : owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2/3
W.P.[MD]No.2187 of 2020
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
5.The Revenue Inspector, Uthappa nayakkanur, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
6.The Deputy Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
W.P.[MD]No.2187 of 2020 23.04.2021
KM(15.06.2021) 3P 7C
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E.Petchiammal
District Collector, Madurai District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti
Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk
Block Development Officer, Usilampatti
Revenue Inspector, Uthappa nayakkanur
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
S.ANANTHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
