A single-paragraph order granting the petitioner's motion to withdraw the writ petition filed under Article 226, considering it infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.20891 of 2013
B.Sevugan
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.(MD)No.20891 of 2013
B.Sevugan Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate, Madurai – 20. 2.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Surveyor Colony, Madurai – 7. 3.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Collectorate, Madurai – 20. 4.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Collectorate, Madurai – 20. 5.The Block Development Officer, Madurai East Panchayat Union Office, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002. 6.The President, Meenakshipuram Village Panchayat, Mangulam Post, Alagar Kovil Via, Madurai District. 7.The Chief Project Officer, VDB Project Limited, No.28, Saint Peter Church Road, Thiruppalai, Madurai – 625 014. 8.M.Manikandan Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.11.2013.
For Petiti oner : Mr.T.Villavankothai For R1 to R5 : Mrs.J.Padmavathidevi Special Government Pleader
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.20891 of 2013
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the official respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 07.11.2013.
2.Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the matter has become infructuous and seek permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
3.Permission is granted. This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (P&A)
// True Copy //
/ /2021
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate, Madurai – 20. 2.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Surveyor Colony, Madurai – 7. 3.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Collectorate, Madurai – 20. 4.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Collectorate, Madurai – 20. 5.The Block Development Officer, Madurai East Panchayat Union Office, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002.
W.P.(MD)No.20891 of 2013 23.04.2021
PM(CO)
KB(12.05.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the writ petition should be granted.
B.Sevugan
The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate, Madurai – 20
The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Surveyor Colony, Madurai – 7
The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals, Collectorate, Madurai – 20
The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Collectorate, Madurai – 20
The Block Development Officer, Madurai East Panchayat Union Office, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002
J.Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
