Writ Petition filed under Article 226 directing Textile Commissioner to release 20% loan subsidy. Court dismissed petition as misconceived since petitioner failed to challenge the earlier rejection order of 2008 through proper appeal.
Writ Petition dismissed as misconceived; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.15709 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.04.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P(MD)No.15709 of 2013
S.Parasuraman ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Textile Commissioner, Minister of Textiles, Powerloom Development Cell,
P.B.No.11500, New Marine Line,
Government of India, Mumbai – 20.
2.The General Manager,
The Tamilnadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd., 692, Anna Salai,
Nandanam, Chennai – 35.
3.The Branch Manager,
The Tamilnadu Industrial Investment
Corporation Ltd.,
100, Railway Feeder Road,
Virudhunagar. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to release the 20% subsidy of the loan amount in favour of the petitioner and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to grant the same amount to the petitioner through 3rd respondent.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondent-1 : Mr.P.Subbiah
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to release 20% subsidy of the loan amount in favour of the petitioner and consequently, to direct the 2nd respondent to grant the same amount to the petitioner, through the 3rd respondent.
1/2
W.P(MD)No.15709 of 2013
the typed set of papers filed by the petitioner. Instead of challenging the said order of the 1st respondent, dated 15.02.2008, the petitioner has simply filed the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, which is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed.
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
MPK
Note :(i) In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
+1 CC to M/s.P.SUBBIAH, Advocate ( SR-17496[F] dated 26/04/2021 )
W.P(MD)No.15709 of 2013 23.04.2021
RK(12.05.2021) 2P 2C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Writ Petition filed directly in Mandamus challenging a 20% loan subsidy is maintainable when a rejection order from 2008 exists.
S.Parasuraman
The Textile Commissioner, Minister of Textiles
The General Manager, The Tamilnadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd.
The Branch Manager, The Tamilnadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd.
J. Nisha Banu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
