Disposed

P.Manimaran v. The Secretary

Madras HC10 Aug 2021WP(MD)/20678/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Preservation of Tamil inscriptions and estampages prompted directions to establish a separate Tamil Epigraphy Branch at Chennai and transfer the materials there within six months. The court also ordered infrastructure, increased funding, appointments and allocation of at least 100 epigraphy posts, disposing of both petitions.

What did the court decide?

Separate Tamil Epigraphy Branch at Chennai and transfer of Tamil materials ordered; infrastructure, increased funding, required appointments and at least 100 epigraphy posts directed.

P.Manimaran Vs The Secretary — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.08.2021 CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020 and W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 17294 of 2019, 14537, 14538 of 2020 and W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 10465, 10467 of 2021

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.20678 of 2019:

¶7

P.Manimaran ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

The Secretary Ministry of Culture Union of India 502-C, Shastri Bhawan New Delhi. 2. The Director General Archaeological Survey of India Under Ministry of Culture, Union of India 24, Tilak Marg New delhi-110 001. 3. The Commissioner Department of Archaeology Government of Tamil Nadu Tamil Valarchi Valaagam Thamizh Salai, Egmore Chennai – 600 008. 4. The Superintending Epigraphist Director (Epigraphy Branch) i/c Under Ministry of Culture, Union of India Puratattva Bhawan, Sanskranthi Circle Hebbal II Stage, Mysore Karnataka – 570 017. 5. The Assistant Superintending Epigraphist Fort St. George Chennai – 600 009. 6. J.Gowthama Sanna … Respondents [R6 is impleaded vide Court order

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

1/21

¶11

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶12

dated 19.07.2021 in W.M.P. (MD) No.19150/2019 in W.P.(MD) 20678 of 2019 by TSSJ & SAIJ]

¶13

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second Respondent to shift all the Tamil inscriptions from Fourth Respondent to Fifth Respondent for preserving, reading, copying by digitalizing, publishing and consequently direct the Third and Fifth Respondents to implement the condition under Article 51(A) of Constitution of India by allocating necessary funds, appointing sufficient epigraphist for digitalizing inscriptions and publish the same for our future generations.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr. N.R.Elango Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S.Ravi For Respondents : Mr. Veera Kathiravan Senior Counsel Assisted by Mr. B.Saravanan Government Advocate (For R3 & R4) Mrs.L. Victoria Gowri ASG (For R1, R2 & R5)

¶15

W.P. (MD) No. 17399 of 2020:-

¶16

V.Illanchezian .... Petitioner Vs. 1. Union of India Ministry of Culture Room No. 501, 'C' Wing Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 015.

¶17

The Office of the Director General Archaeological Survey of India New Delhi.

¶18

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶19

The Department of Archaeology Government of Tamil Nadu Tamil Valarchi Valaagam Tamizh Salai, Egmore Chennai – 600 008.

¶20

The Director The office of the Director https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

2/21

¶22

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶23

Epigraphy branch of Archaeological Survey of India Mysore, Karnataka State. ... Respondents

¶24

Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1, 2 and 5 to transfer all inscriptions and other materials relating to Tamil and other Dravidian inscriptions to the state of Tamil Nadu from Mysore, Karnataka State.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr. S.Siddhartha Vishnu For Respondents : Mr. L.Victoria Gowri (For R1, R2 & R5) Assistant Solicitor General of India Mr. Veera Kathiraven Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. B.Saravanan (For R3 & R4) Government Advocate

¶26

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶27

(Order of the Court was passed by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J ) “ fy;njhd;wp kz;njhd;whf; fhyj;nj thbshL Kd;njhd;wp K:j;jFo ”

¶28

Tamil language is as old as stone, earth. Above is a lyric from Puraporul Venbamalai, which is said to have been written in Ninth Century A.D. This is only to speak about the antiquity of great language Tamil, which has been declared as a classic language by the Central Government in 2004 for the first time.

¶29

Tamil is young, though it is very ancient;

¶30

Tamil is liturgically developed, though it is one of the earliest languages; Tamil was spoken by the most ancient people and still it continues to be spoken by the modern day people.

¶31

The link between the ancient humans and the modern day humans is only through ancient language like Tamil. It is not to claim or trumpet that Tamil is the first Language of the world. It is to emphasise that it is one of the ancient languages of the world and it is the oldest language of India viz., 409 B.C to 508 B.C which is scientifically proved by Carbon Dating of potsherds inscribed with Tamil letters excavated from Keezhadi, Kodumanal and Porundhal, whereas Mauryan Emperor Ashokan's inscriptions in Prakrit, belonging to the third century B.C viz., 268 to 232 B.C.E is considered to be the earliest inscriptions.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

3/21

¶34

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶35

This Court, by an order, dated 22.03.2021 in W.P.(MD). No.8025 of 2020 in the case of G.Sakthi Rao v. The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu and others, while dealing with the issue of reservation for the students who studied in Tamil Medium under “TAMIL NADU APPOINTMENT ON PREFERENTIAL BASIS IN THE SERVICES UNDER THE STATE OF PERSONS STUDIED IN TAMIL MEDIUM ACT, 2010” recorded the antiquity of Tamil language. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the said judgment are extracted hereunder:

¶36

"Tamil is the oldest language.

¶37

It is older than Sanskrit and is beautiful. I can only say "Vanakkam" and I regret I cannot go beyond this"

¶38

said Prime Minister Narendra Modi while addressing a group of school students at "Pariksha Pe Charcha Programme" in Talkatora Indoor Stadium, New Delhi, in February, 2018. It is not only the Hon'ble Prime Minister, but Indologists are also of the opinion that Tamil is one of the ancient languages in the world having literary history of more than 2500 years. Though Prakrit language of "Ashokan Edicts"

¶39

which is stated to be third century BC dated from 268 BC to 232 BC is considered to be oldest in India , it is scientifically proved by carbon dating from the samples of potsherds inscribed with Tamil letters taken from Keezhadi, Porunthal, Alagankulam and Kodumanal that Tamil is one of the ancient languages of the World and the most ancient language of India. The samples of potsherds which contain Tamil alphabets taken from Kodumanal date back to fifth century BC dated 480 BC. Similarly, samples taken from Keezhadi would prove that Tamil language has been in existence as language of people since 6th century dated 580 BC. Pottery samples with Tamil letters from Porunthal indicate the age as 6th century dated 520 BC. Apart from scientific proof, epigraphic inscriptions which have been found throughout the world, especially in India, establish that Tamil is a language that is used invariably in stone inscriptions. In Pan India, Tamil inscriptions which date back upto 3rd century BCE are the highest even as per the statement of the Archaeological Survey of India. Sangam literature of Tamil language also record the antiquity of the language.

¶40

2. The samples of potsherds with Tamil letters not only prove the antiquity of Tamil language, but would also prove the educated masses, who were living at that time and the language, was also, by that time, enriched and known to masses and not confined to royal charts or royal courtiers as found in respect of other languages. Tamil language has been passed on for generations together for the past more https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

4/21

¶42

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶43

than 2600 years. However, as on date, it faces bleak future. The interest to learn the language is shockingly declining and the students undergoing studies in Tamil medium is sharply decreasing among the masses and the parents are interested in admitting their wards only in English medium, ignoring mother tongue, Tamil language. Though studying in English medium is justified for various reasons including employment, students are not even willing to choose Tamil as their second language in school and instead, they opt for Hindi, Sanskrit, French, German, etc. Consequently, children are not able to have any basic knowledge in their mother tongue. It is not only the position in

¶44

Tamil Nadu, similar situation exists in other States wherein the language of States are not learnt by younger generation. Any child is entitled to study and learn through his/her mother tongue and it is the duty of every State to see that the children of the State are given knowledge in their mother tongue, as otherwise, other than English and a few other preferred languages, all other languages would become extinct and vanish from usage.”

¶45

The literature of Tamil could be compared and could be paralleled to ancient literature of any language, as stated by celebrated American Indologist. Professor George Hart, who is an Expert in Sanskrit as well as Tamil having received his Ph.D in Sanskrit from Harvard University in 1971 and worked as a Professor of Tamil language at the University of California and Berkley. He considers both Tamil and Sanskrit as the two eyes of Lord Shiva. When such is the antiquity of Tamil language, the required recognition has not been given to the classic language. However, this Court is of the view that every language spoken by the people, whether it is declared as a classical or not and included in VIII Schedule or not, is precious and has to be preserved and passed on to the next generation.

¶46

Moreover, the inscriptions found in India would also echo the views of this Court that Tamil is the most ancient language of the country. Even according to Archaeological Survey of India, in India, the highest number of inscriptions are found in Tamil language only. The inscriptions are located throughout the country. Not only in this country, they are also found in the other countries like, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Singapore, Cambodia, Mauritius and China. These inscriptions are the sources of history of those days including administration, way of life, the businesses transacted between the people of various countries and the educated masses who were living in those days. The history could be known only through inscriptions and palm leaves manuscripts which have been preserved by the people for the posterity. The Tamil inscriptions, estampages https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and other materials are the subject matters of these Writ Petitions.

¶47

5/21

¶48

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶49

The Petitioners allege that the Tamil inscriptions are located throughout the country and in various other countries. The British people took pain to identify those inscriptions and took copies of those inscriptions which are called 'estampages' travelling to various parts of the countries in a hard way, travelling into jungles and climbing mountains. However, these estampages, collected mostly by the British people and a little by our people, are lying in Epigraphy Branch of Archaeological Survey of India at Mysuru. The Petitioners allege that those estampages of various languages, particularly, Tamil are not properly preserved and protected at Mysuru Epigraphy Office. The Tamil Estampages are not properly maintained or they have been damaged, destroyed and found to be missing. They rely upon news report about nonpreservation of those Estampages in Mysuru in a proper condition. Therefore, the Writ Petition (MD) No. 20678 of 2019 has been filed for the following relief:-

¶50

“directing the Second Respondent to shift all the Tamil inscriptions from Fourth Respondent to Fifth Respondent for preserving, reading, copying by digitalizing , publishing and consequently direct the Third and Fifth Respondents to implement the condition under Article 51 (A) of Constitution of India by allocating necessary funds, appointing sufficient epigraphist for digitalizing inscriptions and publish the same for our future generations.”

¶51

Echoing similar sentiments and allegations, Writ Petition (MD) No. 17399 of 2020 has been filed for the following relief:-

¶52

“directing the Respondents 1, 2 and 5 to transfer all inscriptions and other materials relating to Tamil and other Dravidian inscriptions to the State of Tamil Nadu from Mysore, Karnataka State..”

¶53

The allegations made in the Petitions are being contested by the Respondents that estampages and other materials are preserved properly by taking necessary efforts by the Respondents and there is no necessity to shift the Tamil Estampages, copper plates inscriptions, other Tamil materials and Tamil documents etc., from Mysuru to Chennai. All efforts are being taken to fill up the vacancies of the posts in Epigraphy Branch in Mysuru, Karnataka as well as in Tamil Nadu. Moreover, after restructuring of Archaeological Survey of India, more number of posts have been sanctioned for Epigraphy Branch. Therefore, the allegations made in the Writ Petitions are not supported by any material evidence. Hence, the Respondents seek dismissal of the Writ Petitions.

¶54

Heard Mr. N.R.Elango, learned Senior Counsel appearing for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 20678 of 2019, Mr. Siddhartha

¶55

6/21

¶56

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶57

Vishnu, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 17399 of 2020, Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appearing for the Central Government as well as for Epigraphy Branch of Archaeology and Mr. Muthu Geethaiyan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the State Government and perused the materials placed on record.

¶58

Even a perusal of the counter-affidavit as well as the other documents filed by the Respondents would undoubtedly prove that in India, the number of Tamil inscriptions are the highest. Having said so, in the counter as well as in other communications, the information regarding number of inscriptions of each language, especially, about Tamil are not given properly and contradictory details have been given. The information given under the Right to Information Act on 21.02.2018 by the Office of the Director of Epigraphy, puts the number of Tamil Ancient inscriptions found in India as 38,000 whereas the number of Sanskrit inscriptions found in India is 11,000 only. The language wise inscription list, which has been filed by the Director of Epigraphy on 21^st December 2020 before this Court states that 28,276 inscriptions are in Tamil and 17,001 inscriptions are in Sankrit, whereas, shockingly and surprisingly, the communication, dated 14.07.2021 of Ministry of Culture from the Office of the Director of Epigraphy, Mysuru addressed to the Director General of Archaeology Survey of India, New Delhi would state that approximately 74,000 inscriptions including copper plates have been deciphered. The list regarding number of inscriptions, language wise, is as follows:-

¶59

*Languages*	*Total* *inscriptions*
Telugu	7300
Tamil	28748
Kannada	9410
Persian	354
Dutch	28
Malyalam	226
Latin	8
Urdu	5
Sanskrit	17001
Oriya	74
Prakrit	2501
Hindi	175
Local Dialect	5617
Marathi vices/	182

¶60

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcser

¶61

7/21

¶62

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶63

*Languages*	*Total* *inscriptions*
English	51
Gujarati	16
Assamese	4
Burmese	2
Pali	12
Tibetan	11
Portuguese	74
Marwadi	13
Tulu	10
Arabic	1
Hebrew	26
Rajasthani	2
Chinese	2
Phalavi	5
Manipuri	1
Bengali	9
French	1
Armenian	3
Total	71872
Photographs of seals, sealings, coins etc.	2000
langauge like Kannada,
Prakrit, Sanskrit,
Tamil, Telugu etc.
Total	73872

¶64

A comparison of the following details regarding the number of Tamil inscriptions and Sanskrit inscriptions would undoubtedly prove that there is a clear attempt by the Respondents to show that the Tamil inscriptions are less in number and to inflate the number of Sanskrit inscriptions. It is not understandable as to how 11,000 Sanskrit inscriptions, which are stated to be available as per the RTI information given on 21.02.2018, all of a sudden, it multiplied and became 17,001 as on 21^st December 2020 and 25,756 as on 14.07.2021. By pointing out the contradictions, this Court is not underestimating the antiquity of Sanskrit. Sanskrit is a great and ancient language with rich ancient literature and Sanskrit language has to be preserved, for which, the Central Government is taking much efforts. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶65

8/21

¶66

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶67

*Language*	*No of*	*No of*	*Inscriptions as*
	*inscriptions*	*inscriptions as*	*per communication*
	*as per RTI*	*per list filed by*	*of Epigraphy*
	*dated 21.02.2018*	*Epigraphy Branch*	*Branch of ASI*
		*of ASI*	*dated 14.07.2021*
		*dated 21.12.2020*
Sanskrit	11,000	17,001	25,756
Tamil	38,000	28,276	28,860

¶68

These contradictory details make this Court to conclude

¶69

that, (1) There is an attempt to show that the number of Tamil inscriptions available are lesser in number, in spite of official records and statements made before this Court that the Tamil inscriptions are about 38,000.

¶70

(2) There is an attempt to make it to appear that the Sanskrit inscriptions are more, contrary to the statements and actual numbers given before this Court.

¶71

(3) There is an attempt either to destroy the number of inscriptions /estampages or damage those inscriptions or estampages to show that Tamil is not the only language which has got the highest number of inscriptions.

¶72

(4) The Epigraphy and other materials connected to Tamil language, may not be safe at Mysuru Office of Epigraphy Branch at Mysuru.

¶73

These are all the factual conclusions that could be arrived at by mere perusal and comparison of the details and statements given by the Epigraphy Branch at various points of time and there is no necessity for scientific analysis for reaching this conclusion.

¶74

It is stated that some of the Estampages are not kept in correct sequence and some of them are misplaced and efforts are being taken to identify the misplaced Estampages. As stated above, there is an attempt by the Respondents to give contradictory numbers of inscriptions about Tamil and Sanskrit language, as rightly pointed out by Mr. N.R.Elango, learned Senior Counsel and Mr.S.Siddhartha Vishnu, learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶75

Though it is stated that all the Estampages are preserved properly, Volume XLI of South Indian Inscriptions published by

¶76

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶77

9/21

¶78

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶79

Archaeological Survey of India would show that the following Tamil Estampages are not traceable, which are extracted as follows:-

¶80

“ No.271

¶81

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor District

¶82

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara Temple at Tiruvalangadu, right of entrance.

¶83

Chola Rajadhiraja I, Year 28 = 1046 A.D.

¶84

Sale of land [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶85

No. 272

¶86

(AR No. 489 of 1905)

¶87

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor District

¶88

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara Temple at Tiruvalangadu, Right of entrance.

¶89

Chola Rajakesarivarman = c.12^th Century A.D.

¶90

Mutilated. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶91

No. 273

¶92

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor district

¶93

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara temple at Tiruvalangadu, left of entrance

¶94

Chola Rajadhiraja I, Year 28 = 1046 A.D.

¶95

Mutilated. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶96

No. 274

¶97

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor District

¶98

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara temple at Tiruvalangadu, left of entrance

¶99

Chola Rajakesarivarman = c.12^th Century A.D.

¶100

Mutilated. Contains a portion of the king’s historical introduction. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶101

No. 275

¶102

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor district

¶103

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara temple at Tiruvalangadu, left of entrance

¶104

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chola Rajakesarivarman Rajadhiraja I = c. 1018 - 1054 A.D.

¶105

10/21

¶106

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶107

Damaged. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶108

No. 276

¶109

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor district

¶110

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara temple at Tiruvalangadu,

¶111

left of entrance

¶112

Chola Rajendra I, Year 27 = 1039 A.D.

¶113

Beginning Mutilated. Record an order of Rajendrasinga Muvendavelan. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶114

No. 277

¶115

Tiruvalangadu, Tiruttani Taluk, Chittoor district

¶116

On the third gopura of the Vataranyesvara temple at Tiruvalangadu,

¶117

left of entrance

¶118

Chola Rajadhiraja I = C.1018-1054 A.D.

¶119

No. 426

¶120

Tiruchchengodu, Tiruchchengodu Taluk, Salem District

¶121

On the boulder west of the steps known as Arubadampadi on the hill of the Ardhanarisvara Temple at Tiruchchengodu.b

¶122

Pandya, Jatavarman Sundara -Pandya, Year 10 = c.13^th Century A.D.

¶123

Damaged. Seems to record a gift of land. Mentions the god Subrahmanya-Pillaiyar standing on the hill

¶124

[Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶125

No. 427

¶126

Tiruchchengodu, Tiruchchengodu Taluk, Salem District

¶127

On the boulder west of the steps known as Arubadampadi on the hill of the Ardhanarisvara Temple at Tiruchchengodu.

¶128

Chola, Rajendra I, Year 14 = 1026 A.D.

¶129

Mutilated at the end. Gift of gold. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶130

No. 428

¶131

Tiruchchengodu, Tiruchchengodu Taluk, Salem District

¶132

On the rock close to the Papanasatirtha on the top of the hill of the Ardhanarisvara Temple at Tiruchchengodu.

¶133

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶134

11/21

¶135

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶136

Chola, Parakesari Rajendra I, Year 23 = 1035 A.D.

¶137

Partially damaged. Seems to record a gift of land. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶138

No. 429

¶139

Tiruchchengodu, Tiruchchengodu Taluk, Salem District

¶140

On the rock west of the Ganapatitirtha on the hill of the Ardhanarisvara Temple at Tiruchchengodu.

¶141

Pandya, Jatavaraman Sundara-Pandya, Year 7 = c.13^th Century A.D.

¶142

Damaged. Seems to record a tax-free gift of land to the Pillaiyar (deity) of Tiruchchengodu. It is not clear who made the grant. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable]

¶143

No. 430

¶144

Tiruchchengodu, Tiruchchengodu Taluk, Salem District

¶145

On the south wall of the central shrine in the Ardhanarisvarara Temple on the hill at Tiruchchengodu.

¶146

Vijayanagara, Narasimharaya = 1485 – 1495 A.D.

¶147

Partially damaged. Seems to record a gift of land. [Both estampage and transcript are not traceable].”

¶148

The above details would only disclose that there are many estampages either damaged or lost as they are not properly preserved. The estampages are precious wealth of the nation which have been taken by the hard work of the British people as well as our experts. It is the duty of ASI to preserve them properly, so that, they are available for the present as well as for the future generations to enable them to know about our history, culture and the way of life of our ancestors.

¶149

In the counter affidavit filed by the Archaeological Survey of India, it has been stated that digitization of all the inscriptions irrespective of region will be taken up by the Archaeological Survey of India itself. Though it is stated that Archaeological Survey of India would itself take up the digitization, it is the fact that a Memorandum of Understanding had been signed between the Ephigraphy Branch of Archaeological Survey of India at Mysuru and the Tamil University at Thanjavur as early as on 08.09.2010 to carry out the digitization of Estampages and inscriptions stored in the Mysuru Ephigraphy Wing. Having entered into a Memorandum of Understanding, it is not known as to why the Archaeological Survey of India has not acted as per the MOU and the reason for doing digitization on its own. A perusal of MOU entered

¶150

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶151

12/21

¶152

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶153

into between the Tamil University and the Archaeological Survey of India would disclose that Archaeological Survey of India would provide for digitalization. Clauses (f) and (g) of Paragraph No.7 are as follows:-

¶154

“7. a.. to e..

¶155

f. The Director (Epigraphy), ASI, Mysore shall provide all facilities for digitization such as space for installation of digitization equipments etc.

¶156

g. Utmost care will have to be exercised by the digitizing agency in handling these valuable estampages without causing any damages to them.”

¶157

The above would prove that ASI agreed for providing facilities and in spite of agreeing to provide facilities, nothing has been done.

¶158

One more reason for giving direction to shift the estampages, is as follows:

¶159

The excavation of Adhichanallur ancient site in Tamil Nadu was done during 2005-2006 by the then Director of ASI, Dr. Sathyamurthy. Many ancient artefacts including human skeletons were unearthed during the excavation and they are preserved in Chennai Branch. Till 2018, no sample was taken from the excavated materials including skeletons and sent for Carbon Dating to find out the age. The Madurai Bench of this Court in a Writ Petition filed by one Mr. Kamaraj, in W.P.(MD).No.13096 of 2017 summoned Dr.Sathyamurthy to find out as to why the report about Adhichanalur excavations has not been published. Dr.Sathyamurthy made a statement before this Court that no support was given by the Central Government as well as by the ASI to prepare the report. Therefore, this Court directed the State Government to bear the expenses for sending the excavated samples for Carbon-Dating to the Laboratory at Miami, Florida and United States of America. Thereafter only, Carbon Dating of Adhichanallur samples after 14 years was done and the expenses were borne out by the State Government and thereafter only, it is found that the age of Adhichanallur site is 905-806 B.C. This Court directed the ASI Director, who was present before this Court, Dr.Sathyabama, to prepare and publish the report. Subsequently, the ASI has published the report recently. The act of the ASI in not properly following up the excavation as well as the published result would not serve any purpose.

¶160

The Director (Ephigraphy) for Sanskrit and Dravidian Inscriptions at Mysuru has two Zonal Offices, one at Chennai (South Zone) and another at Lucknow (North Zone) under its administrative control, for the sake of convenient epigraphical survey.

¶161

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶162

13/21

¶163

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶164

It is stated in page No.3 of the counter-affidavit filed by the Archaeological Survey of India that shifting of the Government Office from one locality to another locality is a policy decision depending upon the need and /or administrative convenience. There is no dispute with regard to that. However, there is an immediate necessity to shift the Tamil estampages, copper plates with Tamil inscriptions and other materials and documents of Tamil language from Mysuru to Chennai for the purpose of proper preservation for the reasons already stated. That apart, those materials are needed for Research and Development by the students of Archaeology and Epigraphy. Keeping the materials at Mysuru will definitely not serve the Research Scholars in Tamil Nadu. Mostly, Tamil students and Experts in Tamil are interested in doing Research in Tamil Epigraphy and easy access to those materials would enable them to do the research properly. The following are the benefits of transferring estampages and full-fledged establishments of Office for Tamil inscriptions to Chennai from Mysuru.

¶165

The Epigraphy Branch of Arabic and Persian inscriptions is located at Nagpur which is functioning from the year 1958. It is stated that about 10,000 inscriptions are available in the above languages. In 1990, two Zonal Offices were established, one at Jhansi now functioning at Lucknow and another at Chennai in order to undertake systematic survey of inscriptions. The Lucknow Zonal Office is meant for Sanskrit. Though the Sanskrit is one of the indo-aryan languages, a separate Branch has been established in the name of Sanskrit, whereas Tamil is clubbed with other Dravidian languages. The treatment given to Sanskrit, Arabic and Persian languages has to be given to Tamil language as well. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the Respondents to establish a separate Branch for Tamil.

¶166

The RTI information given on 21.12.2018 by the Office of the Director of Epigraphy branch, Mysuru would show that the number of Sanskrit inscriptions are 11,000. Compared to Tamil, number of Sanskrit inscriptions are very less. However, a dedicated Zonal Office has been established at Lucknow for Sanskrit. The decision was taken in 1990, whereas Tamil has been clubbed in one group of Dravidian languages and no separate Zonal Office for Epigraphy Branch has been established for Tamil, in spite of having the highest number of inscriptions.

¶167

According to the number of inscriptions, in a language, a separate epigraphy Branch for Tamil language has to be established and required number of officials have to be employed, especially, Epigraphists. These are all the facts which compelled this Court to come to the conclusion that the Tamil estampages and other Tamil https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ materials and documents may not be properly preserved and they may

¶168

14/21

¶169

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶170

not be safe in Mysuru. Therefore, Chennai Zonal Office should be named as "Epigraphy Branch (Tamil)" and the materials and the estampages of Tamil shall be shifted to Chennai, within six months.

¶171

When policy decisions are being taken for establishment of a separate Epigraphy Branch for Arabic, Persian and Sanskrit languages, which are having less number of inscriptions compared to Tamil language, there is no reason why such a decision should not be taken for establishment of a separate Epigraphy Branch for Tamil language at Chennai. This Court would not venture to give a direction to shift Tamil materials and estampages, if correct details regarding Tamil inscriptions and Sanskrit inscriptions had been given and the Tamil estampages are properly maintained.

¶172

It is the duty of the Government to preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture as per Article 51-A(f) of the Constitution, which is extracted as follows:-

¶173

Article 51A in The Constitution Of India 1949:-

¶174

51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India

¶175

(a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the national Flag and the National Anthem;

¶176

(b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;

¶177

(c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;

¶178

(d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;

¶179

(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;

¶180

(f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;”

¶181

It is the obligation cast upon the Government, especially, the Central Government to protect every monument or place or object of artistic or historic interest from spoilation, disfigurement, removal, disposal under Article 49 of the Constitution, which is extracted as follows:-

¶182

“Article 49 in The Constitution Of India 1949

¶183

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶184

15/21

¶185

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶186

49. Protection of monuments and places and objects of national importance It shall be the obligation of the State to protect every monument or place or object of artistic or historic interests, declared by or under law made by Parliament to be of national importance, from spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal or export, as the case may be”

¶187

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India insisted about the necessity of preserving our monuments, Archaeological Sites, sculptures in Raji Mankotia -vs- Secretary to the President of India and Ors. reported in (1997) 10 SCC 441 and the relevant paragraphs are extracted as follows:-

¶188

“ The point of reference to these provisions is that an ancient monument is of historical, culture or archaeological or sculptural or monolithic or artistic interest existing for a century and is of national importance or of State importance. In otherwords, either of them are required and shall be protected, preserved and maintained as national monuments or State monuments for the basis which not only gives pride to the people but also gives us insight into the past glory of our structure, culture, sculptural, artistic or archaeological significance, artistic skills and the vision and wisdom of our ancestors, which should be preserved and perpetuated so that our succeeding generations learn the skills of our ancestors and our traditions, culture and civilization. They would have the advantage to learn our art, architecture, aesthetic tastes imbided by the authors of the past and to continue the same tradition for the posterity. Preservation and protection of ancient monuments, is thus the duty of the Union of India and the State Governments concerned in respect of ancient monuments of nationa importance or those of State importance respectively to protect, preserve and maintain them by preserving or restoring them to their original conditions. ”

¶189

In the case of K.Guruprasad Rao -vs- State of Karnataka reported in (2013) 11 SCR 581 the Apex Court held that the protection of ancient monuments has necessarily to be kept in mind while carrying out the development activities.

¶190

As already stated and observed, our history and socioeconomical and cultural values of our ancestors are known to us only from inscriptions, manuscripts, monuments, literature, and ballets, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶191

16/21

¶192

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶193

folklore etc., But stone inscriptions are found in the Temples and other monuments trumpeting our cultural history. It is important to know about our past. These materials only throw light upon as to how our ancestors lived their life about more than 2000 years ago. An inscription, dated 920 AD found in Arulmighu Vaikundavasa Perumal Temple at Uthiramerur, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu only talked about village administration, rural self governance, taxation and land revenue under the Chola Administration about 1,100 years ago. The said inscription also talks about local administration, election and the qualification and disqualification of the candidates etc. When such is the rich culture and administration of our ancestors as reflected in the inscriptions, it is the duty of everyone especially, the Central Government to protect those inscriptions and monuments to spread information about them. It is the duty of the Government to preserve, protect and give a publicity about those ancient monuments, so that, the younger generation could know about them by visiting those sites and reading about them.

¶194

In view of the contradictory details about the number of inscriptions the Fourth Respondent is directed to prepare a compendium of copied inscriptions found in India. The Respondents are directed to take inventory and shift Tamil materials, estampages, copper plates, other documents, etc, from Mysuru to Chennai. The Respondents are directed to conduct a Research in Epigraphy as it is not properly done. The Respondents shall publish the inscriptions found in India in various languages by way of publications regularly, as it is not published regularly in recent times.

¶195

It is submitted that restructuring of ASI is to be done. About 758 new posts have been created, whereas, only a few posts have been allotted to Epigraphy Branch. The said submissions of the petitioner cannot be ignored. Epigraphy Branch is one of the divisions of ASI which requires more number of Officials and Experts, otherwise, in future, nobody could understand the inscriptions. Therefore, there is a need for giving a direction to sanction more posts as has been done during restructuring of ASI with regard to the other Divisions.

¶196

Though 758 new posts have been created as a part of cadre restructuring exercise, subject to the abolishment of 304 posts in the existing scheme of things, not even a single post is said to have been created for Epigraphy Branch. The scholars and experts of Epigraphy took exception to the action of the Government in not giving importance to Epigraphy Branch. India is a vast country and the potential for unearthing inscriptions is more and therefore, it is necessary to at least retain or revive the sanctioned posts, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Dr.T.S.Ravishankar, retired Director of the Epigraphy Branch of ASI

¶197

17/21

¶198

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶199

stated which is reported in the newspapers.

¶200

Further, out of 758 new posts, it is stated about 434 posts have been allotted just for Conservation Assistants and it is opined by the experts that it is unnecessary to have such large number of Conservation Assistants. Instead of that, more posts should be allotted to the Epigraphy Branch as estampages and inscriptions which were taken about 100 years ago are becoming fragile and the work of digitization of 74,000 inscriptions have to be taken up. Further, on an emergency basis, new inscriptions have to be discovered as they are disappearing due to development works, quarrying and mining. Already Epigraphy Branch is suffering without sufficient staff. Therefore, to expedite the work of copying the inscriptions and also discovering the new inscriptions in various parts of India, more experts and staff are necessary. Hence, this Court hopes that the Central Government would take note of it and do the needful.

¶201

It is reported that Dr.Rajavelu, Professor of Epigraphy has said that there are only 31 epigraphists posts for the entire country of which 10 posts are stated to be vacant and only 5 Epigraphic Assistants are there for field survey and deciphering inscriptions. Experts lamented that by not creating additional posts for epigraphy and reducing the sanctioned strength would increase the burden of work besides resulting in a decline in the standard of scholarship. Therefore, it is necessary to give rightful due and create at least more than 100 posts for Epigraphy.

¶202

The learned Counsel for the petitioners would rely upon the newspaper report about the protest made by the employees of Epigraphy to show that though the Epigraphy Branch has 135 years of legacy (Established 1886) and copied nearly 74,000 inscriptions, due to lack of sufficient staff, only 40% of the inscriptions have been published in departmental publications. The remaining 60% of inscriptions are yet to be published. Though the newspapers report may not have much evidentiary value, this Court cannot ignore the said newspaper report, wherein, it has been reported that only 60% of inscriptions are yet to be published. No effective steps are taken by the Epigraphy Division undertaking new expeditions to uncover inscriptions and transcription of inscriptions. There are no sufficient funds allocated for Epigraphy Branch for research and development and also for preservation of estampages, inscriptions, copper plates etc., and therefore, there shall be a direction to the Central Government and ASI to allot more funds for Epigraphy within six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶203

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶204

18/21

¶205

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶206

In view of the above reasonings, this Court finds that the following advantages and benefits would be obtained by transferring the estampages and full-fledged establishment of the Office of Tamil inscriptions to Chennai from Mysuru.

¶207

(a) Easy accessibility to the Students and Research Scholars . The Researchers on History and Culture of Tamil Nadu can easily access the estampages at Chennai. Mysuru is far away and no frequent facilities for transportations from remote places in Tamil Nadu to Mysuru.

¶208

(b)It is more expensive for the students to stay and travel to consult the estampages at Mysuru.

¶209

(c)Senior Retired Epigraphists pertaining to Tamil inscriptions are available only in Tamil Nadu and it is easy for the researchers to consult and read the inscriptions with the help of them.

¶210

(d)The Research on Tamil Ephigraphy is available only in Universities and Colleges in Tamil Nadu. So, it is necessary to have a Tamil Inscription Wing at chennai.

¶211

(e)Nearly 60% of inscriptions are not yet published. Now, it is easy to decipher all the inscriptions with the help of Senior Retired Professors and Epigraphists in Tamil Nadu.

¶212

(f)The very purpose of the establishment of Epigraphy Wing in the year 1887 by ASI under E. Hultszch at Chennai would be accomplished through shifting of estampages in Tamil at Chennai, as it was founded by the British.

¶213

(g)A full-fledged Office for Tamil Inscriptions will solve the problem of new findings which are yet to be discovered in remote places of Tamil Nadu and other parts of the country. New discoveries can be motivated through the Tamil Wing at Chennai.

¶214

(h)Publications and Digitalization will be easy in Chennai rather than in Mysuru, as all the modern technologies are available at Chennai to speed up the work.

¶215

(i)Many inscriptions on the Temple walls of Tamil Nadu are now either demolished or damaged due to various reasons, like, renovations rebuilding etc. Tamil Nadu is studded with nearly 50,000 ancient temples. The history and the antiquity of each temple can be studied through these estampages only which were copied from 1887 onwards. These estampages will certainly help the temple architects when even renovations are taking place. The antiquity of the temple may be preserved through this transfer.

¶216

(j)The inscriptions are the primary sources for reconstructing the history of the people, society, economic conditions, religion, water system and irrigational management etc. They shed more light on the past history of the Tamils. Hence, the availability of the estampages at Chennai would greatly be utilized by the scholars to write authentic history of our ancestors.

¶217

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶218

19/21

¶219

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶220

In order to preserve the estampages and other materials properly, this Court issues the following directions:

¶221

(1)The Respondents are directed to create/establish a separate Office of Epigraphy Branch (Tamil) at Chennai in the lines of Epigraphy Branch (Arabic and Persian Inscriptions) at Nagpur, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶222

(2)The respondents shall transfer all the estampages and other connected Tamil documents and inscriptions to Southern Zone Epigraphy Branch, Chennai or to the proposed separate Office of Epigraphy Branch (Tamil) within a period for six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶223

(3)The Archaeological Survey of India shall appoint required number of Epigraphists and other Officials according to the number of inscriptions in each language;

¶224

(4)The State of Tamil Nadu shall provide all the infrastructures for the purpose of using newly created/converted Epigraphy Branch (Tamil), as per the order of this Court within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶225

(5)The Central Government and the ASI shall allocate more funds for Epigraphy Division of ASI for Research and Preservation of Estampages and other materials within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; and

¶226

(6)There shall be a direction to sanction and allot atleast 100 posts to the Epigraphy Division of ASI, as ASI allotted only 38 posts to Epigraphy Division out of 738 posts created and sanctioned for ASI within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶227

With the above directions, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶228

Sd/-

¶229

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶230

// True Copy //

¶231

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶232

Maya To

¶233

The Secretary Ministry of Culture Union of India 502-C, Shastri Bhawan New Delhi.

¶234

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶235

20/21

¶236

W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020

¶237

The Director General Archaeological Survey of India Under Ministry of Culture, Union of India 24, Tilak Marg New delhi-110 001. 3. The Commissioner Department of Archaeology Government of Tamil Nadu Tamil Valarchi Valaagam Thamizh Salai, Egmore Chennai – 600 008. 4. The Superintending Epigraphist Director (Epigraphy Branch) i/c Under Ministry of Culture, Union of India Puratattva Bhawan, Sanskranthi Circle Hebbal II Stage, Mysore Karnataka – 570 017. 5. The Assistant Superintending Epigraphist Fort St. George Chennai – 600 009. 6. The Additional Chief Secretary to government, Tourism, Culture and religious Endowment Department Seretariat, Chennai-9. 7. The Director The office of the Director Epigraphy branch of Archaeological Survey of India Mysore, Karnataka State. +1 CC to M/s.G.RAJARAMAN, Advocate ( SR-26989[F] dated 23/08/2021 ) W.P. (MD) Nos. 20678 of 2019 and 17399 of 2020 Dated: 19.08.2021 PS(CO) KB(14.09.2021) 21P 9C

¶238

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶239

21/21

P.Manimaran v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Manimaran v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.Saravanan Vs the Govt of Tamilnadu

Shiva Vr Vs the Health Secretary

The Divisional Engineer/Central Vs the District Collector

Subbiah.v Vs the District Collector

Murugan M Vs the District Collector