Petitioner sought writ prohibiting closure of a TASMAC shop. Counsel requested withdrawal, noting government had undertaken to close the shop. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.1668 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.08.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P(MD)No.1668 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)No.1412 of 2021
Prabhu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Exercise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Limited (TASMAC), Madurai Region, Anna Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 3.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Malaigai, Thallakulam, Madurai - 02. 5.The Deputy Collector / District Manager, Madurai North, Madurai District. 6.M.Thala Mohamed ... Respondents (R – 6 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated 01.03.2021 in W.P(MD)No.1668 of 2021)
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from in any manner, closing or shifting the TASMAC Shop No.5422, situated at S.No.69/5B2C, Thattankulam Main Road, Uthangudi Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurair District.
1/3
W.P(MD)No.1668 of 2021
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Veeranasamy For RR 1, 3 & 5 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Standing Counsel for Government For R – 2 : Mr.H.Arumugam For R – 4 : Mr.R.Murali For R – 6 : Mr.Ajmal Khan Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Chengiz Khan
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J. )
Mr.S.Veeranasamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for a while and after this Court expressed opinion that snack vendor has no right, especially when the TASMAC took a decision to close down the shop and gave an undertaking before this Court to close the said shop, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
// True Copy //
ps
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Exercise Department, Secretariat,
Chennai – 9. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2/3
W.P(MD)No.1668 of 2021
2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Limited (TASMAC), Madurai Region, Anna Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 3.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
4.The Deputy Collector / District Manager, Madurai North, Madurai District. +1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-25845[F] dated 10/08/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.R.MURALI, Advocate ( SR-25741[F] dated 10/08/2021 )
W.P(MD)No.1668 of 2021 09.08.2021
RK (25.08.2021) 3P 7C
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prabhu
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Limited (TASMAC)
The District Collector, Madurai District
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation
M. Thala Mohamed
N. Kirubakaran
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
