Dismissed

Faizal Kani. M v. the Delimitation Commission Chairman /

Madras HC23 Nov 2021WP(MD)/20236/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed writ petitions seeking a direction to consider objections under delimitation regulations before passing final orders on a draft ward voters list. The Court found the delimitation commission had invited objections via gazette publication. Dismissing the petitions as infructuous, it allowed petitioners to approach the court individually regarding the gazette.

What did the court decide?

Both writ petitions dismissed as infructuous with liberty to work out remedy individually regarding the gazette publication.

Faizal Kani. M Vs the Delimitation Commission… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.20236 and 20441 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶4

W.P(MD)Nos.20236 and 20441 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.16910 and 17086 of 2021

¶5

M.Faizal Kani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.20236 of 2021 Kaja Mydeen ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.20441 of 2021 Vs.

¶6

1.The Delimitation Commission Chairman/

¶7

The Tamil Nadu State Election Commissioner,

¶8

Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Koyambedu,

¶9

Chennai – 600 106.

¶10

2.The Director of Municipal Administration, Commissionerate of Municipal Administration, No.78, Urban Administrative Building, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

¶11

3.The District Delimitation Authority/ District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶12

4.The Commissioner,

¶13

Tirunelveli Municipal Corporation, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents in both the Writ Petitions

¶14

Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the objection given by the petitioner dated 30.10.2021 under Registration 8(a)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Delimitation Regulations, 2017 before passing final orders on the draft delimitation ward voters list, 2021 published by the 4^th respondent.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick

¶16

in both Writ Petitions

¶17

For 1^st Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan in both Writ Petitions Standing Counsel

¶18

For Respondent Nos.2 : Mr.P.Subbaraj and 3 in both Writ Government Advocate Petitions

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/3

¶21

W.P(MD)Nos.20236 and 20441 of 2021

¶22

For 4^th Respondent in : Mr.S.P.Maharajan both Writ Petitions Special Government Pleader

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.)

¶25

These Writ Petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking for a direction upon the respondents to consider and pass orders on the objection given by the petitioner dated 30.10.2021 under Registration 8(a)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Delimitation Regulations, 2017 before passing final orders on the draft delimitation ward voters list, 2021 published by the 4^th respondent.

¶26

2.The grievance of the petitioners is that the objections were not invited before passing final orders on the draft delimitation.

¶27

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has produced the Gazette Publication of Tirunelveli District, published on 01.11.2021, which states that the Delimitation Commission has submitted its recommendation on the territorial wards of Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation, in the newly re-constituted district to Government after having published the draft proposal for delimitation of territorial wards of Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation based on the last preceding census for general information by inviting and processing the objections / suggestions thereon.

¶28

4.In view of the above, it was contended by the learned Government Pleader that only after receiving suggestions and objections by publishing the draft proposal in the Gazette final delimitation orders were passed.

¶29

5.The learned counsel for the petitioners only sought permission to challenge the Government Gazette individually. In view of the above request made, both the Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous with liberty to workout their remedy in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶30

Assistant Registrar(T & P)

¶31

// True Copy //

¶32

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶33

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/3

¶36

W.P(MD)Nos.20236 and 20441 of 2021

¶37

Note :

¶38

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶39

¶40

1.The Delimitation Commission Chairman/ The Tamil Nadu State Election Commissioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Koyambedu, Chennai – 600 106.

¶41

2.The Director of Municipal Administration, Commissionerate of Municipal Administration, No.78, Urban Administrative Building, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

¶42

3.The District Delimitation Authority/ District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶43

+2 CC to M/s.S.P. MAHARAJAN, Advocate ( SR-35678 & 35679[F] dated 24/11/2021

¶44

+2 CC to M/s.B. SARAVANAN, Advocate ( SR-35756 & 35757[F] dated 24/11/2021 )

¶45

W.P(MD)Nos.20236 and 20441 of 2021 23.11.2021

¶46

AM(CO)

¶47

TR(17.12.2021) 3P 8C

¶48

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶49

3/3

Faizal Kani. M v. the Delimitation Commission Chairman /

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faizal Kani. M v. the Delimitation Commission Chairman /

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthu Vs the Chair Person

Krishnakumari.K Vs the Chair Person

Thamilarasi.N Vs State of Tamil Nadu

V.Bhavani Priya Vs the District Collector

Mercy Maragatham.S Vs the Authorized Officer

Azhagappan.N Vs the Authorised Officer