Dismissed

Mercy Maragatham.S v. the Authorized Officer

Madras HC23 Nov 2021WP(MD)/16961/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking writ of Mandamus to direct respondents to receive remaining sale amount in pursuance of an auction was dismissed as withdrawn by the court with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for remedy. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to workout remedy before appropriate forum.

Mercy Maragatham.S Vs the Authorized Officer — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.16961 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 23.11.2021

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

W.P(MD)No.16961 of 2021

S.Mercy Maragatham

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Authorized Officer, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., Thoothukudi Regional Office, (For SME Branch), No.57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi – 628 002.

¶10

2.The Branch Manager, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., (SME Branch), Door No.48 – D & C, Briand Nagar 7^th Middle Street, Thoothukudi – 628008. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.08.2021 and to receive the remaining sale amount of Rs.55,15,000/- in pursuant to the auction sale held on 28.07.2021 by the 1^st respondent.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.B.Kamalanathan For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilipkumar Standing Counsel

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to workout her remedy before appropriate forum. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. The said submission and endorsement are recorded.

¶15

In view of the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Page 1/2

¶17

W.P(MD)No.16961 of 2021

¶18

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy before appropriate forum. No costs.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (AD II)

¶20

¶21

Note :

¶22

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶23

+1 CC to M/s.N. DILIP KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-35742[F] dated 24/11/2021 )

¶24

W.P(MD)No.16961 of 2021 23.11.2021

¶25

MGJ(06.12.2021) 2P 2C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

Page 2/2

Mercy Maragatham.S v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mercy Maragatham.S v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthu Vs the Chair Person

Krishnakumari.K Vs the Chair Person

Thamilarasi.N Vs State of Tamil Nadu

V.Bhavani Priya Vs the District Collector

Faizal Kani. M Vs the Delimitation Commission Chairman /

Azhagappan.N Vs the Authorised Officer