Disposed

Selvaraj.a v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC8 Nov 2021WP(MD)/19332/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, Justice C.V. Karthikeyan directed the Tahsildhar to notice the petitioner, issue notices to rival claimants, conduct an enquiry, and restore specific patta numbers and effect a mutation in the revenue records within 12 weeks if a fresh representation is filed.

What did the court decide?

Directions to the Tahsildhar to serve notice, conduct an enquiry, restore patta numbers, and complete mutation within twelve weeks.

Selvaraj.a Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.11.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD) No.19332 of 2021

A.Selvaraj

... Petitioner

vs.

The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office Melur, Madurai District

¶8

The Tahsildhar Taluk Office Melur, Madurai District ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 17.07.2021 and to restore the patta nos.2657 and 2164 which was stands in his name along with his brothers regarding the properties in SR.No.502/1 and 513/3A,B and total extents of 6 acre 69 cents in E.Malampatti village, Melur taluk, Madurai District and to do the necessary mutation in the revenue records of Chitta, A-register and Adangal to denote as he and his brothers are the owners of the above said properties

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Mohammed Abbas For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Special Government Pleader.

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus seeking direction against the respondents, particularly against the second respondent to restore the patta nos.2657 and 2164 which stands in his name along with his brothers regarding the properties in SR.No.502/1 and 513/3A,B measuring of 6 acre 69 cents in E.Malampatti village, Melur taluk, Madurai District.

¶13

The mandamus is directed against both the respondents to not only issue notice to the petitioner herein but also to any other rival claimants, conduct enquiry and then proceed in the manner known to law and with respect of the representation given by the petitioner herein.

¶14

A fresh representation through online in accordance with the procedures now in force may be given by the petitioner within a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

¶15

1/2

¶16

¶17

order and after that on receipt of such an application, if it is in order, the second respondent is directed to proceed further and pass final orders within a period of twelve weeks therefrom.

¶18

With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (T&P)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

aav

¶23

¶24

The Revenue Divisional Officer

¶25

Revenue Divisional Office

¶26

Melur, Madurai District

¶27

The Tahsildhar

¶28

Taluk Office

¶29

Melur, Madurai District

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-33780[F] dated 09/11/2021 )

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.19332 of 2021 08.11.2021

¶32

PS(CO)

¶33

KB(24.11.2021) 2P 4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Selvaraj.a v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Selvaraj.a v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chitra Kani Vs State Rep by

H.Krishnamurthy M/a 52 Years Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Jayaseelan Vs Deputy Superintendent of

Mariappan Vs the Special District Revenue Officer

Thirumalai.R Vs the District Collector

Krishnan Vs the District Collector