Dismissed

Lokesh v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC2 Nov 2021WP(MD)/18878/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Elder Assistants challenged a notification fixing March 31, 2021 as the qualifying service date for MD/MS admissions, arguing the entrance exam was in September. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, relying on a prior identical order from the Principal Bench, dismissed the petitions. The court held that fixing the cut-off date is within respondent jurisdiction and was not arbitrary given past c

What the court decided

AI extract

Lokesh Vs the Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

WP(MD). Nos.18878 ,18881, 18921 and 18912 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Special Original Jurisdiction

¶3

Tuesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP(MD). Nos.18878 ,18881, 18921 and 18912 of 2021 Dr.Lokesh, S/O.Selvaraj, Assistant Surgeon(General), Govindampalayam Primary Health Center, Thanthoni Block,Andavankovil West, Karur – 639 002, Karur District. ... Petitioner in WP(MD).No.18878/2021 Dr.Preetha, D/O.Nagarajan, Assistant Surgeon (General), Upgraded Primary Health Center, Thogaimalai-621 313, Karur District. ... Petitioner in WP(MD).No.18881/2021

¶5

Dr.Mutharasan, S/O.Raja, Assistant Surgeon(General) Government Primary Health Center V.Puthur-630 410 Sivagangai District ... Petitioner in WP(MD).No.18921/2021

¶6

Dr.Ananth Prasath, S/o.Madhaiyan Assistant Surgeon(General) Government Primary Health Center Karvazhi, Karur Health Unit District , Karur, Karur District. ... Petitioner in WP(MD).No.18912/2021 Vs 1 The Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St. George , Secretariat Chennai-600009.

¶7

2 The Director Directorate of Medical Education Kilpauk, Chennai-600010.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

1/4

¶10

WP(MD). Nos.18878 ,18881, 18921 and 18912 of 2021

¶11

3 The Secretary Selection Committee,

¶12

No.162 Periyar EVR High Road,

¶13

Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

¶14

4 The Director of Public Health and

¶15

Preventive Medicine ,

¶16

Chennai-600006. ... Respondents in all WPs

¶17

Prayer in WP(MD). Nos.18878 ,18881, 18921/2021:-

¶18

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 4th respondent with respect to the proceedings issued in R.No.67102/PHC5/A2/2020 dated 06.10.2021 and quash the same as far as the fixation of qualifying date for service candidates as 31.03.2021 is concern and render justice.

¶19

Prayer in WP(MD).No.18912/2021:-

¶20

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ,praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2^nd respondent with respect to the Notification dated.06.10.2021 issued for Admission to MD/MS/Diploma courses in Tamilnadu Government colleges /Self Financing Colleges for 2021-2022 Session through G.O.(D).No.1108 Health and Family Welfare (MCA-1)Department dated 04.10.2021 and the consequential proceedings of the 4th respondent issued in R.No.67102/PHC5/A2/2020 dated 06.10.2021 and quash the same as far as the fixation of qualifying date for service candidates as 31.03.2021 is concern and consequently direct the respondents to re-fix the qualifying date for service candidates to any other date from 31.03.2021 taken into consideration the date of Examination i.e,11.9.2021. The date of publication of results i.e.28.09.2021. The date of notification i.e.06.10.2021. And the last date of submission of application i.e.22.10.2021 for the admission to MD/MS/Diploma courses in Tamilnadu Government Colleges /Self Financing Colleges for 2021-2022 session and render justice.

¶21

In all Writ Petitions

¶22

For Petitioner : Thiru.T.M.Madasamy , Advocate

¶23

For Respondents : Thiru.K.S.Selvaganesan and P.Subbaraj , Counsel for state For the intervenor : Thiru.Isaac Mohanlal,Senior Counsel was assisted by Mr.Ragatheesh,

¶24

Common Order

¶25

The respective petitioner in this batch of Writ Petitions assails a notification dated 06.10.2021 insofar as it fixes the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ qualifying date for service candidates as 31.03.2021.

¶26

2/4

¶27

WP(MD). Nos.18878 ,18881, 18921 and 18912 of 2021

¶28

The admitted position in all these Writ Petitions is that the respective petitioner completed the two (2) year service requirement subsequent to 31.03.2021. The prospectus issued through the Health and Family Welfare Department for admissions to Post Graduate degree and diploma courses specified that two years of continuous service would be reckoned as on 31.03.2021. The respective petitioner assails the fixation of the cut off date of 31.03.2021 primarily on the ground that the entrance examination was conducted on 11.09.2021 and that the results thereof were declared on 28.09.2021.

¶29

Mr.P.Subbaraj, learned counsel for the State and Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan, learned counsel for the State, accept notice for all the respondents in this batch of Writ Petitions. They point out that by order dated 25.10.2021 in W.P.Nos.22327, 22331 and 22332 of 2021, an identical issue was considered by the Principal Bench and that the above mentioned Writ Petitions were dismissed on the ground that there is nothing arbitrary or illegal about the fixation of the cut off date as 31.03.2021. A proposed party seeks to implead to point out that 31^st March has been consistently fixed as the cut off date in preceding years and that such cut off date is not liable to be interfered with especially in the absence of a challenge to the prospectus. In view of the order proposed to be passed, such party is heard as an intervenor but not impleaded.

¶30

The earlier order dated 25.10.2021 in W.P.Nos.22327, 22331 and 22332 of 2021 has been placed for consideration before this Court. In such order, the Court concluded that the fixing of cut off dates is within the jurisdiction and the power of the respondents. It was also held that the fixation of a cut off date cannot be interfered with unless the same is held to be arbitrary and illegal. I see no reason to depart from the reasoning adopted in the said order since the admitted position is that 31^st March was the prescribed cut off date for such purpose in the preceding academic years. Consequently, all these Writ Petitions are dismissed without any order as to costs and connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶31

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶32

(*)Seperate order to be Issued as per order of this Hon'ble Court dated 22/11/2021

¶33

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶34

// True Copy //

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

3/4

¶37

WP(MD). Nos.18878 ,18881, 18921 and 18912 of 2021

¶38

¶39

(*)To be substituted to the order already despatched on 18/11/2021 1 The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George , Secretariat, Chennai-600009. 2 The Director, Directorate of Medical Education Kilpauk, Chennai-600010. 3 The Secretary, Selection Committee, No.162 Periyar EVR High Road , Kilpauk , Chennai-600 010. 4 The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine , Chennai-600006. 5. The Special Govt. Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ORDER DATED : 22/11/2021 ========================== ORDER ========================== WP(MD).Nos.18878 ,18881,18921 and 18912 of 2021

¶40

Giving direction and etc. as stated within. RD(19.01.2022) 4P 6C

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

4/4

Lokesh v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Lokesh v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rojapoo Vs The Joint Registrar

Abraham.v Vs the Superintending Engineer

Meenakshi Vs the Chairman

Chandra.S Vs the District Collector

Dr.Vidya Priyadharsini Vs the Secretary to Government

Maranatha Residential Public School Vs the District Collector