Meenakshi v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the Housing Board respondents to consider rectifying a survey number error in a sale deed and execute the deed within two months, subject to petitioners bearing relevant costs.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondents to consider rectification within two months subject to petitioners bearing statutory costs.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD).No.19204 of 2021
1.Meenakshi
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.11.2021 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD).No.19204 of 2021
1.Meenakshi 2.Latha 3.Thiripura Sundari ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Chairman, Housing Board, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.The Manager (Marketing and Service), Madurai Housing Unit, Ellis Nagar, Madurai. 3.The Manager (Marketing and Service), Madurai Housing Unit, Gandhi Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 4.The Sub Registrar, Tallakulam, Madurai North, Rajagambiram, Madurai. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the second and third respondents to execute necessary registered deed of rectification and delete the survey number 154 part and substitute the T.S.No.153 part of Tallakulam Village, Madurai North Taluk in the registered deed of sale dated 03.03.2000 registered as Document No.657/2000 before Sub Registrar, Tallakulam executed by the second respondent in favour of M.S.Vijaya W/o. K.Sundaram in respect of House No.125 (Door No.SLC) at K.K.Nagar, Madurai, and thereby rectify the mistake or error crept in the said document within a time bound fixed by this Court and for other consequential releifs.
| For Petitioners | : | Mr.Mr.S.Ramesh |
|---|---|---|
| For Mr.V.Raghavachari | ||
| For R-1 to R-3 | : | Mr.Mahaboob Athiff |
| For R-4 | : | Mr.P.Subbaraj |
| Counsel for State. |
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the Housing Board respondents to rectify the error in the survey number mentioned in the registered sale deed.
Whether the Petitioners must bear the statutory costs for executing and registering the rectification deed.
Whether the respondents must conclude the rectification process within two months.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meenakshi
- petitioner
Latha
- petitioner
Thiripura Sundari
- respondent
The Chairman, Housing Board, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai
- respondent
The Manager (Marketing and Service), Madurai Housing Unit, Ellis Nagar, Madurai
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court