Dismissed

N. Elayalwar v. the Dist. Collector

Madras HC26 Feb 2021WP(MD)/18759/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus to withdraw and quash an order regarding boundary survey of agricultural land. Permission for withdrawal was granted, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition was granted; consequently, the petition was dismissed and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

N. Elayalwar Vs the Dist. Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.18759 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.02.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.(MD) No.18759 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD) No.15680 of 2020

¶4

N.Elayalwar .. Petitioner

¶5

Vs 1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District.

¶6

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tuticorin District.

¶7

3.The Tahsildar, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

¶8

4.The Deputy Inspector, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

¶9

5.K.Chandran (R5 has been impleaded vide order dated 22.02.2021) .. Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 3^rd respondent in Na.A.No.4618/2019 dated 29-10-2019 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 3^rd respondent to survey, Measurement, and mark the boundary for cents 37.03 property in Survey No.368/3 and 368/37 situated in New Ward 11 Middle Road, Ettayapuram Majra, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District as per the registered document.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Santhanam For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate For R5 : Mr.M.Veilkaniraju

¶12

ORDER

¶13

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

1/2

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.18759 of 2020

¶16

2.Permission is granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mm To 1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tuticorin District. 3.The Tahsildar, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District. 4.The Deputy Inspector, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District. +1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-8234[F] dated 02/03/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.18759 of 2020 26.02.2021 VB (09.03.2021) 2P 6C

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

2/2

N. Elayalwar v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Elayalwar v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

A. Dhanapal Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Lakshmi.T Vs the Divisional Officer

Thirupathi Vs the Regional Passport Officer

R.Rajasekaran Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Muruganantham Vs the Branch Manager

Kezhson.I Vs the Executive Officer