Disposed

Thiravidamani v. Election Commission of India

Madras HC19 Aug 2021WP(MD)/14050/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought return of Rs.6 lakh seized by a flying squad under election moral code. The Court directed the third respondent to consider the appeal and dispose of it via a reasoned order within 30 days, granting a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

The third respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and dispose of it by a reasoned order within 30 days.

Thiravidamani Vs Election Commission of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14050 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.08.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No.14050 of 2021

¶4

M.Thiruvidamani ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

1.Election Commission of India, Rep. by the Chief Election Commissioner, Nirvachan Sadan, New Delhi. 2.The Chief Electoral Officer of Tamil Nadu, Secretary to Government, Public (Election) Department, Fort St. George, Chenai. 3.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Returning Officer, 212 Mudukulathur Assemble Constituency, Mudukulathur, Ramanathapuram District. 5.P.Sekar, The Executive Magistrate, FST-A2 Team, 212 Mudukulathur, Assemble Constituency, Mudukulathur, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to return the seized amount of Rs.6,00,000/- from the petitioner on 22.03.2021 by the fifth respondent-flying squad as a part of implementation of moral code of conduct at 212 Muthukulathur Assembly Constituency during General election for Tamil Nadu Legislative Assemble, 2021. For Petitioner : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran, Counsel for State for R3 : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for R1,R2 and R4

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

1/3

¶9

W.P(MD)No.14050 of 2021

¶10

ORDER

¶11

The petitioner seeks the return of a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- which was seized from him on 22.03.2021 by the fifth respondent/flying squad during implementation of the moral code of conduct in relation to the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Election, 2021.

¶12

2. The petitioner states that he is an agriculturist and that a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- was seized from him inside the premises of the Union Bank, Sayalkudi, Ramanathapuram on 22.03.2021. Upon such seizure, he filed an appeal before the District Collector on 23.03.2021. In spite of providing the necessary explanation, he states that the amount has not been released to him till date.

¶13

3. Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan, learned counsel, appears on behalf of respondents 1, 2 and 4. He states that the role of the Election Commission of India is very limited once the electoral process is concluded. However, he points out that FIR No.128 of 2021 was registered in connection with the occurrence by the Sayalkudi Police Station. He states that a decision with regard to the release of the seized amount should be taken by the District Collector, Ramanathapuram.

¶14

4. Mr.R.Baskaran, learned counsel for the State, appears on behalf of the third respondent. He states that the representation of the petitioner would be considered and disposed of on merits within a reasonable time.

¶15

5. The sum of Rs.6,00,000/- has been seized as early as 22.03.2021. In view of the fact that a FIR has been registered, without doubt, such aspect and all other material aspects should be taken into account by the District Collector before taking a decision. At the same time, a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- is a large sum of money for an individual who claims to be an agriculturist. Therefore, such decision should be taken expeditiously.

¶16

6. Accordingly, without going into the merits of the matter, the third respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2021 and dispose of the same by a reasoned order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner herein.

¶17

7. W.P.(MD).No.14050 of 2021 is disposed of on these terms without any order as to costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar (CS I)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

2/3

¶24

W.P(MD)No.14050 of 2021

¶25

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶26

¶27

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.RAJA KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-27019[F] dated 24/08/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.The Special Government Pleader ( SR-26930[F] dated 23/08/2021 )

¶29

W.P(MD)No.14050 of 2021 19.08.2021

¶30

RS (01.09.2021) 3P 8C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

3/3

Thiravidamani v. Election Commission of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thiravidamani v. Election Commission of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kathiresan.K Vs the Dist.Collector

Vijayakumar.P Vs the Tahsildar

Udayappan Vs the Tahsildar

Abu Pakkar Vs the District Collector

Kannan.N Vs the District Collector

Mohamed Kassali.R Vs the District Collector