Kathiresan.K v. the Dist.Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition alleging discrepancy in FMB sketch and trespass by fourth respondent. Court held preliminary representation was unclear. Writ petition disposed granting leave to submit fresh representation and directing third respondent to consider it after hearing fourth respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.14640 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD) No.14640 of 2021
and W.M.P.(MD).No.11574 of 2021
K.Kathiresan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Madurai.
2.The Assistant Director (Survey) District Survey Office, Collectorate Complex, Madurai 625020
3.The Thasildar, Melur Taluk, Melur, Madurai District.
4.P.L.Senthil ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to the respondents 1 to 3 to direct the nature of writ petition the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2021 to restrain the fourth respondent.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a fresh representation specifying the discrepancy in the FMB sketch must be submitted before undertaking a survey.
Whether the third respondent should be directed to hear the fourth respondent before passing a reasoned order.
How the writ petition should be disposed of before the merits of the property dispute are examined.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Kathiresan
- respondent
District Collector, Madurai
- respondent
Assistant Director (Survey)
- respondent
Thasildar, Melur Taluk
- respondent
P.L.Senthil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court