Disposed

Murugaiyan.S v. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery

Madras HC10 Aug 2021WP(MD)/13776/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery to dispose of a complaint of professional misconduct against a lawyer at the earliest. The Court directed the Council to allot the case to the disciplinary committee and pass appropriate orders after hearing both parties.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Bar Council to allot the complaint to the disciplinary committee and pass appropriate orders after hearing both parties at the earliest.

Murugaiyan.S Vs the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.13776 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.08.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.(MD)No.13776 of 2021

S.Murugaiyan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The BAR Council of Tamil Nadu and

¶10

Pondichery,

¶11

represented by its Secretary,

¶12

High Court Buildings,

Chennai-600 104.

2.M.Lakshmanan

... Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the complaint of the petitioner in complaint No.250/2020, against the second respondent within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar Standing Counsel for R.1 ORDER

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J. )

¶20

The petitioner has come before this Court by filing this writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's complaint No.250/2020, against the second respondent for the alleged professional misconduct committed by him.

¶21

The petitioner, alleging professional misconduct, gave a complaint to the first respondent against the second respondent in complaint No.250/2020. However, no progress has been made, which compelled the petitioner to approach this Court by filing this writ petition.

¶22

Heard Mr.S.Ramasundarvijayraj, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

1/2

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.13776 of 2021

¶26

Notice to the second respondent at this stage is not necessary, as this Court only directs the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's complaint at the earliest.

¶27

Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent would submit that the complaint of the petitioner has been placed before the General Body of the Bar Council on 30.07.2021 and it took a decision to refer the matter before the disciplinary committee and the committee is yet to be decided.

¶28

In view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent, the first respondent is directed to decide the allottment of the case to the disciplinary committee and thereafter, after hearing both parties, appropriate orders shall be passed at the earliest, by the Bar Council.

¶29

With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶30

// True Copy //

¶31

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶32

SSL

¶33

Note :

¶34

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶35

¶36

The Secretary,

¶37

BAR Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery,

¶38

High Court Buildings, Chennai-600 104.

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.S.RAMASUNDARVIJAYARAJ, Advocate ( SR-25953[F] dated 11/08/2021 )

¶40

+1 CC to M/s.NIRANJAN.S.KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-26105[F] dated 12/08/2021 )

¶41

W.P.(MD)No.13776 of 2021 10.08.2021

¶42

CN(17.08.2021) 2P 4C

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶44

2/2

Murugaiyan.S v. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugaiyan.S v. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.Saravanan Vs the Govt of Tamilnadu

Shiva Vr Vs the Health Secretary

The Divisional Engineer/Central Vs the District Collector

Subbiah.v Vs the District Collector

Murugan M Vs the District Collector