Disposed

Anusuya.v v. the Dist. of Elementary Educational Officer

Madras HC5 Oct 2021WP(MD)/11231/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging a suspension order, the court disposed of the matter after the respondent management submitted that the suspension was revoked and the petitioner could resume duty immediately, leaving other grounds open for a request to management.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Anusuya.v Vs the Dist. of Elementary… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.11231 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.10.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.11231 of 2021 and

¶4

W.M.P(MD)Nos.8771, 8774 & 8773 of 2021

¶5

V.Anusuya ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The District of Elementary Educational Officer, having office at Collectorate Building, Virudhunagar District.

¶8

2.The Block Educational Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

¶9

3.The Secretary, Mankapuram Hindu Primary School, Srivilliputhur Post, Virudhunagar District.

¶10

4.A.Senthil Kumar The Secretary, Mankapuram Hindu Primary School, Srivilliputhur Post, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records relating to the impugned suspension order passed by the respondents 3 and 4 in this proceedings Nil dated 16.06.2021 and pass same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to function as Head Mistress in the 3^rd respondent school with all attended benefits and pass such further or other orders.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.V.P.Rajan For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam, Standing Counsel for R1 to R2. Mr.K.K.Kannan, for R3.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

1/2

¶15

W.P(MD)No.11231 of 2021

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The learned counsel for the respondent management has fairly submitted before this Court that School Committee has taken a decision to revoke the suspension order passed against the petitioner and the petitioner can resume his duty tomorrow itself.

¶18

Recording the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. So far, other grounds are concerned, it is open to the petitioner to make a request to the School Management. If such request is made, the School Management, shall consider as expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (AD-I)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

Mnr

¶23

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

¶25

1.The District of Elementary Educational Officer, having office at Collectorate Building, Virudhunagar District.

¶26

2.The Block Educational Officer, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

¶27

3.The Secretary,

¶28

Mankapuram Hindu Primary School,

¶29

Srivilliputhur Post, Virudhunagar District.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-31527[F] dated 07/10/2021 )

¶31

+1 CC to M/s.K.K.KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-31418[F] dated 06/10/2021 )

¶32

W.P(MD)No.11231 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.8771, 8774 & 8773 of 2021 05.10.2021

¶33

RK (22/10/2021) 2P 6C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Anusuya.v v. the Dist. of Elementary Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anusuya.v v. the Dist. of Elementary Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanmugam.a Vs the Chief Educational Officer

Ananthakumar Vs the Chairman

Vijayashanthi.S Vs the Chair Person

R.Padma Vs the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine

Eswaran Vs the Dgp/Director

Dr.Anandasayanam.P Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu