“The allegations mentioned in the affidavit are all being factual aspects, the writ Court sitting under article 226, cannot entertain the order. However, the Learned Single Judge, while considering the same issue has observed that the appellant having not been successful in proving his efficiency by coming up to the expectations of the selection committee, cannot come to the court with a complaint that the selection committee has failed to put proper or sufficient powder on the rope. When hundreds of candidates were able to participate in the rope climbing test successfully for the reasons that two of the candidates were not able to be successful in the rope climbing test, the writ Court cannot entertain this allegation not hold any roving enquiry. The very fact that the petitioner having become unsuccessful in the physical efficiency test, cannot challenge the method of conducting the physical efficiency test, however, in our considered view, the Learned Single Judge has considered the same, therefore, we do not find any infirmities in the order. Accordingly, Writ Appeal fails and is dismissed, Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.”
