Disposed

Y.Allah Baksh v. The Chairman

Madras HC21 Apr 2021WP/9939/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petitioner, a hereditary trustee of a mosque, sought a direction to the Wakf Board to consider his representation regarding reconstruction. The High Court directed the Board to consider the representation and pass orders on merits after issuing notice and hearing within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider representation dated 11.02.2021, issue notice, and pass appropriate orders on merits after hearing within four weeks.

Y.Allah Baksh Vs The Chairman — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21.04.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.No.9939 of 2021

¶5

Y.Allah Baksh ...Petitioner

¶6

¶7

The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Sarang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai 600 001.

¶8

The Chief Executive Officer, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Sarang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai 600 001. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2021.

¶9

For Petitioner : Ms.G.Sumitra
****
ORDER

¶10

The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 11.02.2021.

¶11

According to the petitioner, he is the Hereditary Muthawalli of Mosque and Muslim burial ground situated in Arapakkam Village, Walaja Taluk, Vellore District. The petitioner's ancestors were the hereditary Muthawallis of the said Mosque and burial ground. The petitioner's ancestor Hayath Basha had executed a Will dated 21.08.1952 appointing his grand father Hassan Sheriff, as the Hereditary Muthawalli. After his demise, the petitioner's father Yusuf Sheriff was taking care of the Mosque and burial ground as Muthawalli, till his demise in the year 2010. Thereafter, the petitioner has been discharging the duties of Hereditary Muthawalli. Now, the said mosque, which is more than 150 years old, is in dilapidated condition, The petitioner and his relatives are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ready and willing to contribute for construction of a new

¶12

mosque and that they proposed to complete the construction within a period of six months. after getting permission from the Wakf Board and the Planning permission from the local authority. In this regard, the petitioner sent a representation dated 11.02.2021 to the respondents. Though the said representation was received by the respondents, no order has been passed so far. Hence, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking for the relief stated supra.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2021 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the persons interested in this regard and by affording them an opportunity of personal hearing or virtual hearing, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶15

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar srn To 1. The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Sarang Street, Vallai Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai 600 001. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Sarang Street, Vallai Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai 600 001. +1cc to Mr.G.Sumithra, Advocate SR.No. 24217 W.P.No.9939 of 2021 GPL(CO) A.SK(16.06.2021)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Y.Allah Baksh v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.Allah Baksh v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Abuthahir Vs The Secretary to Government

P.Maheshkumar Vs The District Collector

Karthikeyan Sundaresan Vs The Registrar of Companies

Anna Makkal Nala Sangam Vs The District Collector

D.Rajendran Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Salem Textile Limited Vs Government of INdia