Dismissed

A.Shaliq Ali v. The Chief Executive Officer

Madras HC19 Apr 2021WP/9598/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, through Justice Puspha Sathyanarayana, dismissed two writ petitions (W.P.Nos.9598 and 14156 of 2019) filed by A.Shaliq Ali and K.Meera Hussain on the ground that they were subject to withdrawal. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of writ petitions as withdrawn; closure of connected writ miscellaneous petitions.

A.Shaliq Ali Vs The Chief Executive… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 19.04.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

W.P.Nos.9598 and 14156 of 2019 and W.M.P. Nos.10204 & 10205 of 2019

¶6

(Heard through VC)

¶7

A.Shaliq Ali .. Petitioner in W.P.No.9598/2019 K.Meera Hussain .. Petitioner in W.P.No.14156/ 2019 Vs. 1.The Chief Executive Offficer Tamil Nadu Wakf Board No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai - 1 .. 1st respondent in both WPs 2.M.Sirajudeen 3.A.V.Mohammed Ali .. Respondents 2 & 3 in W.P. No. 9598/2019 and Respondents 3 and 4 in W.P. No.14156/2019 4.The Election Officer/Wakf Superintendent Poonamallee Zone, Big Mosque Campus Poonamallee, Chennai - 56 .. 2nd respondent in W.P. No.14156 of 2019

¶8

Prayer in W.P. No.9598 of 2019 : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records of the 1st respondent ending with Se.Mu.Order.No.13881/18/B4/Kanchi dated 19.3.2019 and quash the same.

¶9

Prayer in W.P. No.14156 of 2019 : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records of the 1st respondent in Se.Mu.Order.No.13881/18/B4/Kanchi dated 19.3.2019 and 2nd respondent dated 22.04.2019 in Na. Ka. G.S. No.216/Kanchi/Va.Ka.2019 and quash the same.

¶10

For Petitioner in both: Mr.B.Vijay

¶11

WPs

¶12

For Respondents in : Mr.V.Raghavachari for R1 W.P. No.9598/2019 : Mr.T.Velumani for R2 Dr.S.Seethalakshmi for R3

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

For Respondents in : Mr.V.Raghavachari for R1&R2 W.P. No.14156/2019 Mr.T.Velumani for R3 Dr.S.Seethalakshmi for R4

¶15

COMMON ORDER

¶16

Mr.B.Vijay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this court to withdraw the writ petitions. He has also sent an e-mail to this effect to the Registry.

¶17

In view of the representation made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶18

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
Asr
TO
The Chief Executive Offficer
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street
Vallal Seethakathi Nagar
Chennai – 1.
•
2 ccs to M/s. B. Vijay, Advocate Sr.24178, 24180
W.P.Nos.9598 & 14156 of 2019 and
W.M.P. Nos.10204 & 10205 of 2019
SSN(CO)
EU 6.5.2021

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Shaliq Ali v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Shaliq Ali v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.R.Vinod Kumar Vs The Registrar of Socieites

Praveenraj Rajenderan Vs The Under Secretary

R.Anandhan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

T.Ashokkumar, Vs The District Collector

M.Sirajudeen Vs The Honourable Chairman

Kirubakaran Prince Vijay Daniel Vs Union of India