Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for time-bound consideration of his representation. The petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition before the court disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.09.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Writ Petition No.9545 of 2021 (Through Video Conferencing)
D.Lucas ...Petitioner
Vs.
Thindivanam. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second Respondent to consider the representation dated 05.01.2019 of the Petitioner on merits within the time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.P.Arivuchudar For M/s.Law Square For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Babu Standing Counsel
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rrg
To
+1cc to M/s.Law Square, Advocate, S.R.No.50460
+1cc to Mr.R.Ganesh Babu, Advocate, S.R.No.49821
W.P.No.9545 of 2021
PM(CO)
RGA(12/10/2021)
D. Lucas
1. Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
3. The Joint Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
4. The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
