Allowed

D.Sampath v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

Madras HC24 Sept 2021WP/20465/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras directed the Accountant General and District Forest Officer to implement the first respondent's promotion order, granting revised pension and consequential benefits to the retired petitioner with effect from 19.07.2004 within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directions to implement the promotion order dated 15.07.2017 and grant revised pension from 19.07.2004 within twelve weeks.

D.Sampath Vs The Principal Chief Conservator… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 24.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.20465 of 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

D.Sampath

... Petitioner

1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Maaligai, Jeenis Road,

¶11

Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶12

2.The District Forest Officer, Vellore District.

¶13

3.The Accountant General (A & E), DMS Compound,

¶14

Theynampet, Chennai – 600 018. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to implement the first respondent proceedings No.AB2/9020/2017 dated 15.07.2017 get revised pension in the category of Forest Guard with effect from 19.07.2004 and all consequential monetary benefits by considering the representation dated 07.03.2019 and reminder dated 07.01.2020.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani

¶17

For Respondents : For R1 & R2

¶18

: Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal

¶19

Government Advocate

¶20

For R3

¶21

: Mr.Vijay Shankar

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the first and second respondents and Mr.Vijay Shankar, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the third respondent.

¶24

The petitioner was appointed as a Plot Watcher in the year 1982. He was promoted as a Forest Watcher on 30.12.2006. Since the petitioner's juniors were promoted as Forest Watchers as early as 24.01.1995 and thereafter as Forest https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Guards on 31.05.2004, thereafter the petitioner filed

¶25

W.P.No.17610 of 2012 before this Court. The said writ petition was allowed on 10.07.2012. Meanwhile, the petitioner was also promoted as a Forest Guard on 17.02.2014.

¶26

By an order dated 15.07.2017, the first respondent

¶27

fixed the notional pay of the petitioner with effect from 19.07.2004.

¶28

The petitioner has retired from service. The petitioner has sent two representations to the second and third respondents on 07.03.2019 and 07.01.2020 which have not evoked any positive response from the second and third respondents. The second and third respondents have however not given effect to the promotion which calculating pension even though the petitioner has been retrospectively promoted with effect from 19.07.2004.

¶29

Considering the fact that the petitioner is aged about 62 years and retired from service, this Court is inclined to direct the second and third respondents to implement the promotion order dated 15.07.2017 of the first respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs.

Sd/Asst. Registrar

//True Copy//

arb

1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Maaligai, Jeenis Road, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

¶36

2.The District Forest Officer, Vellore District.

¶37

3.The Accountant General (A & E), DMS Compound, Theynampet, Chennai – 600 018.

¶38

+1 C.C.to MR.S.MANI, ADVOCATE, SR.NO.49583/2021

¶39

+1 C.C.to SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.NO.49868/2021

¶40

W.P.No.20465 of 2021

¶41

PM(CO)

¶42

RA 20/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Sampath v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Sampath v. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Saradhamanidevi Vs The Chief Educational Officer

E.Saritha Vs The Managing Director

M.S.Selvaraj Vs Pandy

Gopinathan K. Vs Rukmani

T.K.Selvaraj Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

T.v.Usha Rani Vs The State of TamilNadu