S.Ranganathan, v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition challenging disconnection of electricity connection was disposed of as infructuous as the petitioner admitted the cause of action no longer existed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07-12-2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP No. 8428 of 2014 And MP No.1 of 2014
S.Ranganathan ...Petitioner vs.
- The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.
- The Assistant Engineer, C.E.D.C./North, TNEB, Rajaji Nagar,Chennai – 600 049.
- The Assistant Executive Engineer, O&M,Perambur, No.33/11, K.V.Sub Station, Periyar Nagar, Perambur,Chennai – 600 082.
- V.Ganesan (R-4 impleaded vide order of Court dated 07.12.2021 made in MP No.2 of 2014 in WP 8428 of 2014) ..Respondents
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the third respondent culminating in LR No.AEE/ O&M/PERAMBUR/F.LT SC 072078189/D No.131/2014 dated 18.02.2014 and quash the same and to direct the third respondent from in any way disconnecting the Electricity Connection granted to the petitioner in SC 072078189.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Ranganathan
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
- respondent
Assistant Engineer, C.E.D.C./North, TNEB
- respondent
Assistant Executive Engineer, O&M,Perambur
- respondent
V.Ganesan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court