M/S. Dcw Limited, v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition challenging a Solar Purchase Obligation order was closed by the High Court of Madras without further consideration, as the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity had already adjudicated the factual and legal issues in earlier appeals.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petitions stood closed without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.12.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.NO.12390 OF 2013 AND M.P.NOS.3 & 4 OF 2013 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2014
M/s. DCW Limiteg Rep. by its Senior General Manager (Electrical) 358, Anna Salai, Thousand Lights, Chennai — 600 006 ... Petitioner
Vs.
- Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power, Shram Shakti Bhavan, Ministry of Power, New Delhi - 1
- State of Tamil Nadu Through its Secretary Department of Energy Fort St. George, Chennai — 600 009
- Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 3 rd & 4 th Floor, Chanderlok Building, 36, Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001
- Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary No. 19A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai — 600 008
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court needs to reconsider the Writ Petition after the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity disposed of the related matters.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. DCW Limiteg
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
- respondent
Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court