The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct a private security company to stop using a restricted uniform. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the date of hearing.
No relief granted; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.7562 of 2017
N.Veeramani
...Petitioner
Vs
The Chief Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Government, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009 ...Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2017 and pass orders and to direct the Private Security Company restrict not to use the resemble restricted uniform.
On 16.02.2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to get instructions with regard to the withdrawal of this Writ Petition. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Chief Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Government, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009
N. Veeramani
The Chief Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Government
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
