R.Nagaraj v. The Sub Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition filed under Article 226 directing return of registered documents, the Court recorded that documents had been released to the petitioner and closed the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.04.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Writ Petition No.5421 of 2021
R.Nagaraj ...Petitioner
-Vs-
The Sub Registrar Kangeyam Sub - Registrar Office No. 8, Taluk Office Campus, Kangayam – 638 701. ...Respondent
Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to return the registered documents Doc No. P / Kangeyam / 10 / 2020 dated 09.03.2020 within the time frame as may be fixed by this Honourable Court.
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction directing the respondent to return the registered documents within the time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
- Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondent, on instructions, would submit that, the documents have been released in favour of petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner has also submitted that the documents have been released in his favour.
- Recording the submissions, as the documents have been released to petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Nagaraj
- respondent
The Sub Registrar Kangeyam
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court