G.Padmapriya, v. The Chief Area Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner failed to appear; the respondent appeared. The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 for non-prosecution without considering the merits.
The petitioner failed to appear; the respondent appeared. The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 for non-prosecution without considering the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.4242 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.4395 of 2017
G.Padmapriya
Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indane Area Office, No.500, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. 2.The Tahsildar, Chengam Taluk, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.Anandkumar 4.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
5.The Executive Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Indian Oil Bhavan, No.130, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 34. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents 1 and 3 from opening the Gas Agency in the name of Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) for the area of Pudupalayam, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
For petitioner ... No appearance
For respondents ... Mr.K.Parameshwaran for R2 & R4
Government Advocate Mr.Ravi Ramasamy for R1 & R5 ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 08.01.2021, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents
are present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Tahsildar,
Chengam Taluk, Chengam,
Tiruvannamalai District.
2.The District Collector,
Thiruvannamalai District,
Thiruvannamalai.
AKM/19.2.21 /2P-3C/
W.P.No.4242 of 2017
01.02.2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Padmapriya
Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited
District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District
Abdul Qudduse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court