Mrs.Latha, v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a dismissed writ petition where the petitioner failed to appear. The High Court of Madras dismissed the petition for non-prosecution after the respondents appeared but the petitioner was absent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.3646 of 2017
Mrs.Latha … Petitioner
Vs
1.The Chairman,
Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Assistant Secretary (Plots),
Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Chennai – 600 005. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the
respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner
dated 5.10.2016 and allot the Plot No.404, door No.76, New
No.86, Karunanithi Nagar 1 st Street, Sastri Nagar, Tondiarpet,
Chennai-600081 in the name of the petitioner.
For petitioner ... No appearance
For respondents ... Mr.S.Rajeswaran
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 08.01.2021, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. However,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs. Latha
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board
- respondent
The Assistant Secretary (Plots), Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court