B.Parthiban v. The Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22-09-2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP No.39656 of 2016
B.Parthiban ...Petitioner
vs.
The Chairman, Human Rights Committee, Government Tourist Home, Uppalam, Home Department, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry – 605 001. ...Respondent
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to proceed with the complaint dated 07.05.2016 given by the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thiagarajan
O R D E R
The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner through Video Conferencing Mode, made a submission that he has chosen to withdraw the present writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Parthiban
- respondent
The Chairman, Human Rights Committee, Government Tourist Home, Uppalam, Home Department, Government of Puducherry
Coram
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court