The petitioner sought a writ mandamus to register an imported car without demanding Entry Tax Clearance. The court disposed of the petition upon the submission that tax arrears were already paid via demand draft on the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 19.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.37080 of 2005
V.Shankar ...Petitioner
Vs.
Chennai - 600 006.
(Cause title amended as per order dated 14.12.2005 in W.M.P.No.42050 of 2005)
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to register the imported car viz. Porsche bearing Chassis No.WPOZZZ99Z5S735578, without demanding Entry Tax Clearance Certificate from the 2nd respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Lakshmi Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents made a submission that the arrears of tax has
already been paid by the petitioner, by way of Demand Draft No.905637 dated 19.08.2021. Thus, no further adjudication is required and accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
+1 CC to The Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 41884.
W.P.No.37080 of 2005
BP(CO) LS(14/09/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Shankar
State of Tamil Nadu
Commercial Tax Officer, Chennai
Regional Transport Officer (West), Chennai
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
