Petitioner sought declaration against the Prohibition and Excise department. The Court found the cause for the suit had vanished and disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.28679 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.No.35004 of 2003
E.Anandan ...Petitioner
Vs
Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue of Writ of Declaration, declaring G.O.245, Prohibition and Excise (VI) Department, dated 04.10.2003, as illegal and ultravires to the Constitution of India.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Saravana Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran Government Advocate [R1 & R2]
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner, through VideoConferencing, made a submission that the cause arose for the purpose of filing the present writ petition became vanished. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in this writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Kak
To
W.P.No.28679 of 2003
SSV[co] NSK 03/09/2021
E.Anandan
The State of Tamil Nadu
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
