Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of an impugned order regarding retirement services. The court recorded that the petition had become infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 05.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.35500 of 2007
M.Sivakumar ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner of Police, Central Zone, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ambattur. 3.The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Poonamallee. ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the first respondent's impugned order Na.Ka.No./L.1/2997/30411/2007 dated 17.10.2007, to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to accept the voluntary retirement services application of the petitioner dated 8.9.2007.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Magesh Special Government Pleader ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
1.The Joint Commissioner of Police,
Central Zone, Egmore,
Chennai - 600 008.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Ambattur.
3.The Asst. Commissioner of Police,
Poonamallee.
4.The Public Prosecutor
High Court,
Madras.
+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr537
W.P.No.35500 of 2007
aa02/02/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Sivakumar
The Joint Commissioner of Police
R.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
