Dismissed

M/s.Nvr and Co. v. The Director General of Foreign Trade

Madras HC10 Dec 2021WP/30636/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records the dismissal of a writ petition filed by a trading company. The counsel for the petitioner successfully argued that the prayer had become infructuous, leading the High Court to dismiss the petition without costs and close connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

M/s.Nvr and Co. Vs The Director General of Foreign Trade — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 10.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

W.P.NO.30636 OF 2018 AND W.M.P.NOS.35724, 35726 & 35730 OF 2018

¶6

M/s.N.V.R & Co., Rep. by its Proprietrix, Ms.Vivekanandam Vasanthy, 4/441, Kullurchandai Road, Virudhunagar – 626 001, Tamil Nadu. ...Petitioner

¶7

..Vs..

¶8

1.The Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce & Industries, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, H Wing, Gate No.2, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi - 110 011.

¶9

2.The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce & Industries, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, H Wing, Gate No.2, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi - 110 011.

¶10

3.The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai II Commissionerate, Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. ...Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in and connected with Notification Nos.04 and 05/2015-20 dated 25.04.2018 and Notification No.37/2015-2020 dated 28.09.2018 read with Trade Notice No.05/2018 dated 09.05.2018, Trade Notice No.10/2018 dated 16.05.2018 and Trade Notice No.12/2018 dated 18.05.2018 attributable to the 1^st and 2^nd respondents and quash the same and further direct the 3^rd respondent to permit clearance of about 2000 MTS of Peas falling under Exim Code 0713 1000 in terms of Sales Contract No.SW/69/2018-19 dated 15.11.2018.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

For Petitioner : M/S.A.Suresh

¶14

For Respondents

¶15

: Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao Central Govt. Standing Counsel

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶18

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

sp/mpl

¶24

¶25

1.The Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce & Industries, Department of Commerce,

¶26

Udyog Bhavan, H Wing, Gate No.2,

¶27

Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi - 110 011.

¶28

2.The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce & Industries, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, H Wing, Gate No.2, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi - 110 011.

¶29

3.The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai II Commissionerate, Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

¶30

W.P.No.30636 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.35724, 35726 & 35730 of 2018

¶31

SJ(CO) RVM(28/12/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Nvr and Co. v. The Director General of Foreign Trade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Nvr and Co. v. The Director General of Foreign Trade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Lakshmi Ganesh Spinning Vs The Chairman

Jvs Export Vs Tamil Nadu Generation &

Sri Cheran Synthetics India Vs The Chairman

O.M.S.P Columbus and Partners Vs The Director General of Foreign Trade

O.M.S.P Columbus and Partners Vs The Director General of Foreign Trade

O.M.S.P Columbus and Partners Vs The Director General of Foreign Trade