Disposed

Tmt.Mullaimalar, v. The Commissioner

Madras HC3 Sept 2021WP/34924/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ of Mandamus for police protection to implement sports contracts. Court directed petitioner to send representation to respondents who must act within specified timelines before closing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to send representation to respondents; respondents directed to pass appropriate orders within six weeks; petition disposed of.

Tmt.Mullaimalar, Vs The Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P.No.34924 of 2019
AND
W.M.P.Nos.35708 of 2019 and 453 of 2020

¶6

Tmt.MullaiMalar

¶7

 ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai

¶10

2.The Executive Engineer (Parks and Play Field Department) Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai

¶11

3.The Commissioner of Police No.132, EVK Sampath Road, Veppery, Chennai

¶12

4.The Inspector of Police R2, Kodambakkam Police Station, Arcot Road, Kamarajar Colony, Dr.Subbaraya Nagar, Kodambakkam Chennai - 600 024

¶13

5.The Inspector of Police J2 Adyar Police station No.56, Lattice Bride Road, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020

¶14

6.The Inspector of Police

¶15

K 3, Shenoy Nagar Police Station, 3rd Avenue, Anna Arch Road, N.S.K Nagar, Arumbakkam, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 600 106

¶16

7.The Inspector of Police F 3, Nungambakkam Police Station, Valluvar Kottam High Road, Poonangipuram, Nungampakkam Chennai - 600 006

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

8.The Inspector of Police
 J 9, Thuraipalkam Police Station
 Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Pillayar Koil Street,
 Thuraipakkam Jothi Nagar,
 Oggiyamduraipakkam
 Chennai – 600 007
9.The Inspector Of Police
 R 9, Valasarawalkam Police Station
 Choudry Nagar Main Rd,
 Choudry Nagar, Valasaravakkam,
 Chennai 600 087
10.The Zonal Officer
 Zone - 10
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 Door No.11/25, Dr. Ambedkar Road,
 Corporation Colony, Kamaraj Colony,
 Kodambakkam, Chennai - 24
11.The Zonal Officer
 Zone - 13
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 No. 31, Thiruvengadam Street,
 Kasturba Nagar, Adyar.
 Chennai – 600 020
12.The Zonal Officer
 Zone 8
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue,
 Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 600 030.
13.The Zonal Officer
 Zone -9
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 8, Lake Area, Nungambakkam,
 Chennai, 600 034
14.The Zonal Officer
 Zone -14
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 6/64, Puzhuthivakkam Main Road,
 Perungudi, Chennai 600 091
15.The Zonal Officer
 Zone - 11
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 33, Arcot Rd, Zone XI, Valasaravakkam,
 Chennai, 600 087. ...Respondents

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to
9 to offer police protection to the petitioner in implementing
the Contract awarded by the 2nd respondent,

¶21

i.dated 25.2.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-3/2018

¶22

ii.dated 25.2.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-4/2018
iii.dated 28.8.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-1/2018
iv.dated 28.8.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-2/2018

¶23

so as to enable the petitioner to develop the sports activity,
including the areas covered under the jurisdiction of
Respondents Nos.10 to 15.

¶24

For Petitioner :M/s.AR.M.Arunachalam

¶25

For Respondents :Mr.C.E.Pratap
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking
issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 9 to
offer police protection to the petitioner in implementing the
Contract awarded by the 2nd respondent, i.dated 25.2.2019
A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-3/2018; ii.dated 25.2.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.
No.B2/1044-4/2018; iii.dated 28.8.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-1/
2018; iv.dated 28.8.2019 A.Thu.Na.Ka.No.B2/1044-2/2018, so as to
enable the petitioner to develop the sports activity, including
the areas covered under the jurisdiction of Respondent Nos.10 to
15.

¶28

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is
an experienced trainer in the aquatic sports and other such ball
games activities for over a period of 25 years and she is able
to administer as well as having work force in and around the
city. The first respondent floated tender in February 2019 in
respect of providing technical support with Men and Materials
including operation, safety, collection and sharing of the
Maintenance over the Ball Badminton Courts, Skating Courts and
Tennis Courts situated at various places on the Chennai city
including the areas under control and jurisdiction of the
respondents 10 to 15 viz., Zone Nos.8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 at
Chennai City and subsequent to the tender, the petitioner was
awarded 4 contracts together with an undertaking for the annual
increase of 5%. The period of contract is for 5 years.

¶29

3.It is the further case of the petitioner that
thereafter she started the activities of improving the areas and
making it fit for games. Nearly 60 Courts / areas out of 73
earmarked for promotion of the games gave full support whileso,
in 13 other courts, the anti social elements want a share in
contract and one of them filed W.P.No.9683 of 2019 before this

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

Court seeking to declare the entrustment of the playfields to
the petitioner as illegal and the same was dismissed on
11.06.2019. Even thereafter, some of the rowdy elements
continuously threaten the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner
made representation dated 19.11.2019 to the respondents and
since there is no action, has filed this writ petition.

¶32

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would
suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents 3 to
6 to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the
petitioner, within a reasonable time frame.

¶33

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted
that the representation of the petitioner will be considered,
however, for ready reference, this Court may issue direction to
the petitioner to send a copy of the representation along with a
copy of this order to the respondents.

¶34

6.In view of the above, this Court directs the petitioner
to send a copy of the representation along with a copy of this
order to the respondents, so as to enable the respondents 3 to 6
to pass appropriate orders, within a period of two weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the
said representation, the respondents shall consider the same and
pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks thereafter.

¶35

7.The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No
costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.

¶36

Sd/-

¶37

Assistant Registrar (CS-VI)

¶38

// True Copy //

¶39

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶40

sma/pri

¶41

To

¶42

1.The Commissioner,

¶43

Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai

¶44

2.The Executive Engineer (Parks and Play Field Department) Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, Chennai

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶46

3.The Commissioner of Police
 No.132, EVK Sampath Road,
 Veppery, Chennai
4.The Inspector of Police
 R2, Kodambakkam Police Station,
 Arcot Road, Kamarajar Colony,
 Dr.Subbaraya Nagar,
 Kodambakkam
 Chennai - 600 024
5.The Inspector of Police
 J2 Adyar Police station
 No.56, Lattice Bride Road, Adyar,
 Chennai - 600 020
6.The Inspector of Police
 K 3, Shenoy Nagar Police Station,
 3rd Avenue, Anna Arch Road,
 N.S.K Nagar, Arumbakkam,
 Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 600 106
7.The Inspector of Police
 F 3, Nungambakkam Police Station,
 Valluvar Kottam High Road,
 Poonangipuram,
 Nungampakkam
 Chennai - 600 006

¶47

8.The Inspector of Police
 J 9, Thuraipalkam Police Station
 Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Pillayar Koil Street,
 Thuraipakkam Jothi Nagar,
 Oggiyamduraipakkam
 Chennai – 600 007
9.The Inspector Of Police
 R 9, Valasarawalkam Police Station
 Choudry Nagar Main Rd,
 Choudry Nagar,
 Valasaravakkam,
 Chennai 600 087
10.The Zonal Officer
 Zone - 10
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 Door No.11/25, Dr. Ambedkar Road,
 Corporation Colony,
 Kamaraj Colony, Kodambakkam,
 Chennai - 24

¶48

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶49

11.The Zonal Officer
 Zone - 13
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 No. 31, Thiruvengadam Street,
 Kasturba Nagar, Adyar.
 Chennai – 600 020
12.The Zonal Officer
 Zone 8
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 36B, 2nd Cross Street, Pulla Avenue,
 Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 600 030.
13.The Zonal Officer
 Zone -9
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 8, Lake Area, Nungambakkam,
 Chennai, 600 034
14.The Zonal Officer
 Zone -14
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 6/64, Puzhuthivakkam Main Road,
 Perungudi, Chennai 600 091
15.The Zonal Officer
 Zone - 11
 Greater Chennai Corporation
 33, Arcot Rd, Zone XI, Valasaravakkam,
 Chennai, 600 087

¶50

+1cc to Mr.A.R.M.Arunachalam, Advocate SR.No.44536

¶51

W.P.No.34924 of 2019
And
W.M.P.Nos.35708 of 2019
 and 453 of 2020

¶52

PCK(CO)
RVM(06/10/2021)

¶53

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tmt.Mullaimalar, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tmt.Mullaimalar, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayasarah Jayachandran @ Sarah Devy Marie Madeline Vs the State Rep.by

K.Sathish Vs the State Rep by

Parvathi Vs State Rep by

Suman @ Suman Menon Vs G.Jayashree

Vinodh Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Arivoli Vs The Director General of Police