The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed to quash an FIR for lack of prosecution by the petitioner, noting the matter was listed for dismissal and the petitioner made no appearance.
The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.No.28602 of 2018
and Crl.MP.No.16644 of 2018
Vinodh Kumar
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State
Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
F-3, Nungambakkam Police Station,
Chennai-600 034.
2. Prateekshita
.. Respondents
Prayer : This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482
of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.326 of 2018
on the file of the first respondent police, and quash the same.
For Petitioner: No appearance
ORDER
When the Criminal Original petition was taken up for
hearing on 01.09.2021, there was no representation on behalf of
the petitioner and the matter was posted on 03.09.2021 under the
caption "for dismissal".
2Even Today, when the matter is called, there is
no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal
Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rli
To
1. The Inspector of Police, F-3, Nungambakkam Police Station, Chennai-600 034.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.28602 of 2018
and Crl.MP.No.16644 of 2018
LN(CO)
SB(04/10/2021)
Vinodh Kumar
The State
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court