The Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 challenging construction activities. The court noted the work was completed and the building inaugurated, closing the case without substantive orders.
None granted; case disposed without further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.10.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.34507 of 2019
G.Prabhu .. Petitioner
Vs
2 State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Chief Secretary Municipal Administration and
Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
9 Thangamuthu
10 Mariappan .. Respondents
(Respondents 9 and 10 impleaded vide order dated 8.1.2020 made in WMP No.118 of 2020)
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 4, 5, 7 and 8 not to carry on any constructions activity in S.No.94/2B at Tharamangalam Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District.
For the Petitioner : No appearance
For the Respondents : Ms.R.Anitha Counsel for the State for respondents 1 to 8
: Mr.M.R.Jothimanian for respondents 9 and 10
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The petitioner is not represented.
There will be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To:
W.P.No.34507 of 2019
MG(CO) CB(27/10/2021)
G.Prabhu
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Chief Secretary Public Works Department
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Chief Secretary Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department
District Collector Salem
Superintendent Engineer Public Work Department
District Revenue Officer Salem
Sanjib Banerjee
P.D. Audikeshavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
