In the absence of representation from either side for both hearings, the High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 34111 of 2013 stood for dismissal without merits.
Writ Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.34111 of 2013
The Management of Pohini Mills Private Ltd., Indiampalayam, Arasur Post, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. ...Petitioner
vs
1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem.
2.P.Madan raj ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the first respondent herein in I.A.No.174 of 2010 in I.D.No.89 of 2010, dated 29th October 2013 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : No appearance
O R D E R
Earlier on 28.06.2021, it was represented that Mr.K.V.Shanmuganathan, learned counsel appearing for R2 had given change of vakalat. Hence, the Registry was directed to print the name of R2 in the cause list and post the matter under the caption “for dismissal” after a week.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem.
W.P.No.34111 of 2013
PCH(CO) RVM(28/07/2021)
The Management of Pohini Mills Private Ltd.
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem
P. Madan raj
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
